From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752047Ab1ITRnk (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Sep 2011 13:43:40 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:64675 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750806Ab1ITRnj (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Sep 2011 13:43:39 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH REPOST 1/2] arm/dt: Tegra: Update SDHCI nodes to match bindings Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 19:43:29 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.35-22-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Grant Likely , nicolas.pitre@linaro.org, Olof Johansson , Shawn Guo , Chris Ball , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1316537186-26753-1-git-send-email-swarren@nvidia.com> In-Reply-To: <1316537186-26753-1-git-send-email-swarren@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201109201943.29510.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:3G8U9NXS10v01h5rwKtHM8DWefk7N8YxWZje/1zhKuT zhV1YMAPGmaxJf+4NO878G3/n6av5tmmpXQx+KJTSmhMAaKRZ/ FXQ/AXbyV34wyuV5+iQAWvli2+Jb+5iQahkfed5VgCwU6zdxz3 aVedciTbK4yQZ62NFrVJ4yxbTiqJWheDettONDHh2es9JV9fHY zX8G+k6wBnOskV+p+jtTQlsAMYmd9TKjrBV9ZrzvFpyTKny/PC ZTrYuKk3qu5TwPa2Rmt410eZTJu4rXLZDkBHa9LR9luDNpOY7m aPIUdGHYcfX4dTpnqsAhGTKa8U7Ey4SvVIUf70q7i0Dw+z+1i9 PG6xwBivPThyyYpjSoNE= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 20 September 2011, Stephen Warren wrote: > The bindings were recently updated to have separate properties for each > type of GPIO. Update the Device Tree source to match that. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren > Acked-by: Olof Johansson > --- > I'd previously sent these to Grant assuming they'd go in his dt/next branch, > but perhaps these should go in through Arnd's arm-soc next/dt branch? > Which tree has the update that changed the bindings? I think it should go into the same one. If it's already upstream, I can take it into the fixes branch. Arnd