From: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"avi@redhat.com" <avi@redhat.com>,
"jeremy@goop.org" <jeremy@goop.org>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>, Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [V5][PATCH 3/6] x86, nmi: wire up NMI handlers to new routines
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 10:06:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110921140609.GQ5795@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110921104935.GA2451@gere.osrc.amd.com>
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:49:36PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> + Tony.
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 01:41:39PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> > On 09/20/2011 10:43 PM, Don Zickus wrote:
> > > Just convert all the files that have an nmi handler to the new routines.
> > > Most of it is straight forward conversion. A couple of places needed some
> > > tweaking like kgdb which separates the debug notifier from the nmi handler
> > > and mce removes a call to notify_die (as I couldn't figure out why it was
> > > there).
> >
> > It is used to call a debugger on a machine check, according to following
> > thread:
> >
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/27/114
>
> Thanks for digging that out - I couldn't find anywhere in the git logs
> why was this added in the first place.
>
> > So maybe we can turn that into a kgdb direct call?
>
> After reading the thread, the semi-legitimate usage of using it as
> a jump into the debugger just because some hardware reports certain
> conditions through an MCE sounds pretty hacky to me.
>
> Besides, if the driver developer needs that, he can add the code for the
> duration of her/his development cycle as aid, and remove it in the end.
>
> This early-exit deal is especially inacceptable if you get an
> uncorrectable error and some notifier call in the chain consumes it and
> we never get to report it or decode it, or do recovery action. And thus
> the box merrily continues on although a corruption just happened and we
> didn't even get a chance to panic.
>
> So I really really want to remove it, actually.
Cool. Thanks Ying and Boris for settling that. I was scratching my head
trying to understand why that was there. It keeps the code simpler to
now. :-)
Cheers,
Don
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-21 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-20 14:43 [V5][PATCH 0/6] x86, nmi: new NMI handling routines Don Zickus
2011-09-20 14:43 ` [V5][PATCH 1/6] x86, nmi: split out nmi from traps.c Don Zickus
2011-09-20 14:43 ` [V5][PATCH 2/6] x86, nmi: create new NMI handler routines Don Zickus
2011-09-21 5:36 ` Huang Ying
2011-09-21 13:56 ` Don Zickus
2011-09-20 14:43 ` [V5][PATCH 3/6] x86, nmi: wire up NMI handlers to new routines Don Zickus
2011-09-21 5:41 ` Huang Ying
2011-09-21 10:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-09-21 14:06 ` Don Zickus [this message]
2011-09-20 14:43 ` [V5][PATCH 4/6] x86, nmi: add in logic to handle multiple events and unknown NMIs Don Zickus
2011-09-20 17:23 ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-20 20:10 ` Don Zickus
2011-09-21 5:45 ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-21 5:43 ` Huang Ying
2011-09-21 13:57 ` Don Zickus
2011-09-21 10:08 ` Robert Richter
2011-09-21 14:04 ` Don Zickus
2011-09-21 15:18 ` Robert Richter
2011-09-21 15:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-21 16:04 ` Robert Richter
2011-09-21 16:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-21 16:13 ` Don Zickus
2011-09-21 16:24 ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-21 16:54 ` Robert Richter
2011-09-25 12:54 ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-21 17:10 ` Don Zickus
2011-09-20 14:43 ` [V5][PATCH 5/6] x86, nmi: track NMI usage stats Don Zickus
2011-09-20 14:43 ` [V5][PATCH 6/6] x86, nmi: print out NMI stats in /proc/interrupts Don Zickus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110921140609.GQ5795@redhat.com \
--to=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@amd64.org \
--cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=minyard@acm.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
--cc=steiner@sgi.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).