From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751191Ab1IWRk5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2011 13:40:57 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:16294 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750717Ab1IWRk4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2011 13:40:56 -0400 Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 19:36:56 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: "Serge E. Hallyn" Cc: lkml , richard@nod.at, Andrew Morton , "Eric W. Biederman" , Tejun Heo , serge@hallyn.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] user namespace: make signal.c respect user namespaces Message-ID: <20110923173656.GA5233@redhat.com> References: <20110919214531.GA18085@sergelap> <20110920174849.GB22317@redhat.com> <20110920185354.GA19629@sergelap> <20110921175357.GA25590@redhat.com> <20110923163113.GA3820@sergelap> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110923163113.GA3820@sergelap> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/23, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > It looks like I can fix all the > cases except ptrace_signal(). Although we can simply ignore this case, imho. > at send_signal() Yes, I was thinking about this too but didn't have the time to check if this can really work. > by checking whether si_fromuser(info) I am not sure... sys_rt_queueinfo() is nasty. Plus we have to handle the "fromkernel" case too. May be we can ignore this too. Oleg.