From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752919Ab1IWXqj (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2011 19:46:39 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:54539 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750967Ab1IWXqi (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2011 19:46:38 -0400 Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 20:46:21 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Linus Torvalds Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Anton Blanchard , Darren Hart , David Ahern , "David S . Miller" , Eric B Munson , Frederic Weisbecker , Ian Munsie , Ingo Molnar , Masami Hiramatsu , Mike Galbraith , Paul Mackerras , Pekka Enberg , Peter Zijlstra , Robert Richter , Stephane Eranian , Thomas Gleixner , yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 00/12] perf tools fixes Message-ID: <20110923234621.GC8543@ghostprotocols.net> References: <1316809586-28529-1-git-send-email-acme@infradead.org> <20110923211158.GC27519@ghostprotocols.net> <20110923212523.GD27519@ghostprotocols.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by canuck.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 04:12:54PM -0700, Linus Torvalds escreveu: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > wrote: > > > > Sorry about the noise, there is a problem in the way the python binding > > is built, i.e. it should notice that the header changed and rebuild the > > python binding, I bet this was what made David not notice it :-\ > > Can you please make sure that gets fixed at some point too? No huge > hurry, it can wait for the next merge window, but bugs like that not > only cause this kind of stupid compile errors, they also cause really > odd "why doesn't it work" problems that people can spend tons and tons > of time debugging, because they don't really "exist" - they're just a > result of a stale object file that didn't get properly recompiled. Will get that fixed. Its a hell of a lot annoying to me. > > You noticed it probably because it was the first build of the tool on > > your local repo or used a new O= output dir. > > I do "git clean -dqfx" every once in a while (especially after having > done "make allmodconfig" builds before -rc releases etc), and I don't > recompile the perf tools very often. So yeah, this was the first build > after a cleanout event. Thanks for testing it that way. I'll do my best not to fail in such last minute -rc tests. removed. :-P - Arnaldo