From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752501Ab1IZP0h (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Sep 2011 11:26:37 -0400 Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:59025 "EHLO opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752045Ab1IZP0g (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Sep 2011 11:26:36 -0400 Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 16:26:34 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Grant Likely , Arnd Bergmann , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Manjunath GKondaiah , Dilan Lee , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3] drivercore: Add driver probe deferral mechanism Message-ID: <20110926152634.GN2946@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <20110922184614.25419.84606.stgit@ponder> <20110926141643.GK2946@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20110926151210.GO22455@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110926151210.GO22455@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> X-Cookie: You are always busy. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 04:12:10PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 03:16:43PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > used but it's not a blocker for anything. Devices doing this would need > > some way to figure out if they should -EBUSY or fail otherwise. > Just to avoid confusion - ITYM -EAGAIN there. -EBUSY is already used > by drivers to mean "someone else claimed a resource I need" be it the > IO region or an IRQ resource... Yes, I do - sorry.