From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
Cc: dedekind1@gmail.com, dwmw2@infradead.org,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] mtd: Add DiskOnChip G3 support
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:45:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201109281445.47715.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878vp96fhl.fsf@free.fr>
On Tuesday 27 September 2011, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> >
> > Really, passing the entire register name into an inline function is much
> > preferred over string concatenation, because it lets you grep for where
> > certain definitions are used.
> Right. But how do handle the "#seq" then ?
>
> The whole point here is to write humanly readable debug messages. A message of
> the like "doc_flashsequence: 48 SET_PLANE1" is much better than
> "doc_flashsequence: 48", don't you think ?
>
> If we consider to loose that debugging messages, it's way easier to drop the "do
> .. while(0)" sequences, and just keep the register write.
>
> Now if you're convinced removing the "SET_PLANE1" debugging message is less
> important that ability to grep the full register name, why not, but from a
> maintenance point of view I would prefer letting the "macroness" in.
I generally recommend removing debug messages like this entirely from
production code. If you need them on production systems, that is an indication
that the code quality is not good enough. Enabling the debug output like
this also creates a lot of almost identical strings, which you don't need
if you turn it into an extern function that does
static const char docseq[] = {
[DOC_SEQ_RESET] = "reset",
[DOC_SEQ_PAGE_SIZE_532] = "page_size_532",
};
dev_dbg(dev, "doc_flashSequence: %02x %s\n", docseq[seq]);
with exactly the same output.
Or you could turn the entire tracing into trace events and do the parsing
in user space, which seems appropriate if you frequently need to trace
these.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-28 12:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-21 19:27 [PATCH V4] mtd: Add DiskOnChip G3 support Robert Jarzmik
2011-09-22 14:45 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-22 17:42 ` Robert Jarzmik
2011-09-27 13:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-27 17:51 ` Robert Jarzmik
2011-09-28 12:45 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2011-10-01 12:19 ` Robert Jarzmik
2011-10-01 15:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-23 19:14 ` [PATCH V5] " Robert Jarzmik
2011-09-27 12:58 ` Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201109281445.47715.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox