From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next-20110923: warning kernel/rcutree.c:1833
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:18:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110929231828.GA4931@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110929171901.GA6900@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:19:01AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:12:05AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 02:30:44PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> [ . . . ]
>
> > > Sure I can take your patches (I'm going to merge the delta into the first).
> > > But if you want a rebase against -rc8, it's going to be easier if you
> > > do that rebase on the branch you want me to work on. Then I work on top
> > > of it.
> > >
> > > For example we can take your rcu/dynticks, rewind to
> > > "rcu: Make synchronize_sched_expedited() better at work sharing"
> > > 771c326f20029a9f30b9a58237c9a5d5ddc1763d, rebase on top of -rc8
> > > and I rebase my patches (yours included) on top of it and I repost.
> > >
> > > Right?
> >
> > Yep! Your earlier three patches look to need some extended-quiescent-state
> > rework as well:
> >
> > b5566f3d: Detect illegal rcu dereference in extended quiescent state
> > ee05e5a4: Inform the user about dynticks-idle mode on PROVE_RCU warning
> > fa5d22cf: Warn when rcu_read_lock() is used in extended quiescent state
> >
> > So I will leave these out and let you rebase them.
>
> And for whatever it is worth, my following patches depend on yours as
> well, so will not include them in the rebase:
>
> 61cf7640: Remove one layer of abstraction from PROVE_RCU checking
> 9a4d1ce3: Warn when srcu_read_lock() is used in an extended quiescent state
And the new stack passes moderate rcutorture testing, and is available
at https://github.com/paulmckrcu/linux on branch rcu/next.
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-29 23:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-25 0:24 linux-next-20110923: warning kernel/rcutree.c:1833 Kirill A. Shutemov
2011-09-25 5:08 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-25 11:26 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2011-09-25 13:06 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-09-25 14:19 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2011-09-25 16:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-26 1:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-09-26 1:10 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-09-26 1:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-26 1:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-26 9:39 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-09-26 22:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-27 12:07 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-09-26 9:42 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-09-26 22:35 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-26 9:20 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-09-26 22:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-27 12:16 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-09-27 18:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-28 12:31 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-09-28 18:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-28 23:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-09-29 0:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-29 4:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-29 12:30 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-09-29 17:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-29 17:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-29 23:18 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2011-09-30 13:11 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-09-30 15:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-30 19:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-10-01 4:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-10-01 12:24 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-01 12:28 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-01 16:35 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-10-01 17:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-10-02 3:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-10-02 11:45 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-02 22:50 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-03 0:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-10-03 12:59 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-03 16:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-10-03 17:11 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-02 23:07 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-03 0:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-10-03 13:03 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-03 16:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-10-06 0:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-10-06 1:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-10-06 12:11 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-06 18:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-10-06 23:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-26 1:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-26 8:48 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-09-26 8:49 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-09-26 22:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-27 11:55 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110929231828.GA4931@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).