From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757184Ab1JAUc1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Oct 2011 16:32:27 -0400 Received: from 1wt.eu ([62.212.114.60]:33349 "EHLO 1wt.eu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756791Ab1JAUcX (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Oct 2011 16:32:23 -0400 Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 22:32:18 +0200 From: Willy Tarreau To: Andreas Schwab Cc: Greg KH , Andy , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: kernel.org status: hints on how to check your machine for intrusion Message-ID: <20111001203218.GD14779@1wt.eu> References: <20111001141751.GA8937@zeus> <20111001142848.GA27058@kroah.com> <20111001165659.GB18690@1wt.eu> <20111001171916.GA11989@zeus> <20111001175456.GC18690@1wt.eu> <20111001184044.GA13608@zeus> <20111001190612.GA14779@1wt.eu> <20111001192438.GA22938@kroah.com> <20111001200700.GG18690@1wt.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 10:29:54PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Willy Tarreau writes: > > > I discovered that 002/022 are not the only differences. Adrian used > > to set 2.6.16.x at umask 000, and Linus changed the user in the > > tarballs several times (torvalds, then git, then root). I'm also > > seeing a certain greg/users for 2.6.11.x :-) > > Obviously tarballs before 2.6.12 weren't created with git-archive and > will contain unpredictable timestamps. I did not remember when the git-tar command was introduced, but your comment makes a lot of sense ! We're not much interested in 2.6.11 anyway I think. Regards, Willy