From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932121Ab1JCOIf (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Oct 2011 10:08:35 -0400 Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:46549 "EHLO opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751135Ab1JCOI3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Oct 2011 10:08:29 -0400 Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 15:08:24 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Sangbeom Kim , "'Jassi Brar'" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "'Liam Girdwood'" Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] ASoC: samsung: wm8994 depends on mfd_wm8994 Message-ID: <20111003140824.GM3731@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1317587284-2776-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <1869072.QQLATNzYYx@wuerfel> <20111003120741.GD23811@sirena.org.uk> <11174515.ANsqIhx0NX@wuerfel> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <11174515.ANsqIhx0NX@wuerfel> X-Cookie: You will contract a rare disease. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 03:43:10PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > You've not sent a seprate patch for that one yet... > I wasn't sure any more which version you wanted. Is this this right one? I was expecting something that selects the core. I was also expecting something that can be applied against -next which this patch can't be, this doesn't feel like something we should be rushing into 3.1.