From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 9/9] xen/p2m/debugfs: Fix potential pointer exception.
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 12:37:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111003163757.GH17108@phenom.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1317370697.26672.230.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 09:18:17AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 20:52 +0100, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > We could be referencing the last + 1 element of level_name[]
> > array which would cause a pointer exception.
>
> If we end up accessing it does that not mean something, i.e. should it
> not be a real string here and not NULL? Otherwise isn't it a bug in the
> lookup code that we end up looking there?
Yup. I altereted it per your recommendation to be "error".
>
> I think this lookup correspond to the initialisation of lvl=4 and
> falling through the subsequent list of checks without matching one. In
> which case I think level_name[4] should be "unknown" or even "error".
Picked "error"
>
> I don't think you can hit type_name[4] in the same way, type and
> prev_type are always one of the TYPE_* defines, which have values 0..3
> inclusive. You could make this more obvious and defend against future
> changes breaking this with:
> ... type_name[] = {
> [TYPE_IDENTITY] = "identity",
> [TYPE_MISSING] = "missing"
> ...
> };
Oooh, pretty. OK, queued another patch with that.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-03 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-29 19:52 [PATCH] Xen bug-fixes for 3.2 (v1) Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-29 19:52 ` [PATCH 1/9] xen/pciback: Do not dereference psdev during printk when it is NULL Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-30 7:31 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2011-10-03 16:14 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-29 19:52 ` [PATCH 2/9] xen/pciback: Return proper error code from sscanf Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-30 7:45 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2011-10-03 16:18 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-29 19:52 ` [PATCH 3/9] xen/pciback: Check if the device is found instead of blindly assuming so Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-30 7:50 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2011-09-29 19:52 ` [PATCH 4/9] xen/events: BUG() when we can't allocate our event->irq array Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-30 7:55 ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Campbell
2011-10-03 16:21 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-29 19:52 ` [PATCH 5/9] xen/events: Don't check the info for NULL as it is already done Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-29 19:52 ` [PATCH 6/9] xen/irq: If we fail during msi_capability_init return proper error code Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-29 19:52 ` [PATCH 7/9] xen/xenbus: Check before dereferencing it Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-30 8:01 ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Campbell
2011-10-03 16:26 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-29 19:52 ` [PATCH 8/9] xen/enlighten: Fix compile warnings Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-30 8:10 ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Campbell
2011-10-03 16:30 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-29 19:52 ` [PATCH 9/9] xen/p2m/debugfs: Fix potential pointer exception Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-30 8:18 ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Campbell
2011-10-03 16:37 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111003163757.GH17108@phenom.oracle.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=error27@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox