public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm00@gmail.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
	Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
	Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
	Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>, Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 00/10] memcg naturalization -rc4
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 09:47:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111004074723.GA13681@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111003161149.bc458294.akpm00@gmail.com>

On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 04:11:49PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 23:00:54 +0200
> Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > this is the fourth revision of the memory cgroup naturalization
> > series.
> 
> The patchset removes 20 lines from include/linux/*.h and removes
> exactly zero lines from mm/*.c.  Freaky.

It adds 42 lines more comments than it deletes.

The diffstat looked better when this series included the soft limit
reclaim rework, which depends on global reclaim doing hierarchy walks.
I plan to do this next, it deletes ~500 lines.

> If we were ever brave/stupid emough to make
> CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR=y unconditional, how much could we simplify
> mm/?

There will always be a remaining part that is only of interest to
people with memory cgroups, but that doesn't mean we can't shrink this
part to an adequate size.

> We are adding bits of overhead to the  CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR=n case
> all over the place.  This patchset actually decreases the size of allnoconfig
> mm/built-in.o by 1/700th.

Most of the memcg code should be completely optimized away with =n,
except for some on-stack data structures that have a struct mem_cgroup
pointer.

In the meantime, major distros started to =y per default and people
are complaining that memcg functions show up in the profiles of their
non-memcg workload.  This one worries me more.

> A "struct mem_cgroup" sometimes gets called "mem", sometimes "memcg",
> sometimes "mem_cont".  Any more candidates?  Is there any logic to
> this?

I used memcg throughout except for two patches that I fixed up.  I
don't think there is any reason to keep them different, so I'll send a
fix to rename the remaining ones to memcg.

> Anyway...  it all looks pretty sensible to me, but the timing (at
> -rc8!) is terrible.  Please keep this material maintained for -rc1, OK?

Thanks, and yeah, the timing is ambitious, I hoped that the deferred
release and merge window could make it possible.

I'll keep it uptodate.

      reply	other threads:[~2011-10-04  7:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-29 21:00 [patch 00/10] memcg naturalization -rc4 Johannes Weiner
2011-09-29 21:00 ` [patch 01/10] mm: memcg: consolidate hierarchy iteration primitives Johannes Weiner
2011-09-29 21:00 ` [patch 02/10] mm: vmscan: distinguish global reclaim from global LRU scanning Johannes Weiner
2011-09-29 21:00 ` [patch 03/10] mm: vmscan: distinguish between memcg triggering reclaim and memcg being scanned Johannes Weiner
2011-09-29 21:00 ` [patch 04/10] mm: memcg: per-priority per-zone hierarchy scan generations Johannes Weiner
2011-09-30  9:25   ` Michal Hocko
2011-09-29 21:00 ` [patch 05/10] mm: move memcg hierarchy reclaim to generic reclaim code Johannes Weiner
2011-09-29 21:01 ` [patch 06/10] mm: memcg: remove optimization of keeping the root_mem_cgroup LRU lists empty Johannes Weiner
2011-09-29 21:01 ` [patch 07/10] mm: vmscan: convert global reclaim to per-memcg LRU lists Johannes Weiner
2011-09-29 21:01 ` [patch 08/10] mm: collect LRU list heads into struct lruvec Johannes Weiner
2011-09-29 21:01 ` [patch 09/10] mm: make per-memcg LRU lists exclusive Johannes Weiner
2011-09-29 21:01 ` [patch 10/10] mm: memcg: remove unused node/section info from pc->flags Johannes Weiner
2011-09-30  8:05 ` [patch 00/10] memcg naturalization -rc4 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-30  9:32   ` Johannes Weiner
2011-10-03 10:04     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-30  9:31 ` Michal Hocko
2011-10-03 23:11 ` Andrew Morton
2011-10-04  7:47   ` Johannes Weiner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111004074723.GA13681@redhat.com \
    --to=jweiner@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm00@gmail.com \
    --cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=gthelen@google.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    --cc=yinghan@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox