From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932297Ab1JDOo5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Oct 2011 10:44:57 -0400 Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:45449 "EHLO opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756986Ab1JDOo4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Oct 2011 10:44:56 -0400 Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 15:44:54 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Axel Lin Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Subject: Re: ASoC: wm8994: Is the rate_reg for wm8994-aif2 correct? Message-ID: <20111004144453.GG6934@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1317737239.6419.6.camel@phoenix> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1317737239.6419.6.camel@phoenix> X-Cookie: You are always busy. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 10:07:18PM +0800, Axel Lin wrote: > While reading wm8994.c, it seems the correct rate_reg for wm8994-aif2 > should be WM8994_AIF2_RATE. > I cannot find wm8994 datasheet, could you help checking it? Looks good, I've applied - thanks!