From: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>
To: Amit Sahrawat <amit.sahrawat83@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: UDF: alternate anchor block detection
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 16:51:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111004145156.GA4183@joi.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADDb1s3Ab18ppaDKeRYMnX9TSb_kHaj4T1wUA=FeNUjpxF2cRw@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 05:16:15PM +0530, Amit Sahrawat wrote:
> While mounting UDF media, when the primary AVDP is not found at block
> 256, UDF code tries to read-in the alternate AVDP.
> In the function udf_find_anchor, udf_scan_anchors is called 3 times,
> where each call to udf_scan_anchors read 12 blocks.
> In case there is no alternate AVDP stored, a total of 36 blocks are
> read before mount fails - causing time delay for Mount Failure.
>
> 1) After first call to udf_scan_anchors and before the second call
> there is varconv conversion, for the older drivers, which skips 7
> blocks after every 32 blocks. What are these older drivers? Do we
> still require this code?
I'm not sure what "drivers" are you talking about, but "UDF_SET_FLAG(sb,
UDF_FLAG_VARCONV)" does not convert anything - it just sets superblock
flag.
> 2) After varconv conversion, why is there a third call to
> udf_scan_anchors? In the 1st call and 3rd call to udf_scan_anchors,
> exactly same blocks are read, so this 3rd call seems to be redundant.
Because UDF_FLAG_VARCONV changes behavior of udf_scan_anchors.
Marcin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-04 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-03 11:46 UDF: alternate anchor block detection Amit Sahrawat
2011-10-04 14:51 ` Marcin Slusarz [this message]
[not found] <CAOiN93m2OUnv95jpCT++Edv0yCwWG1mWa6uAYsuk2MGjKHZpJQ@mail.gmail.com>
2011-10-06 21:50 ` UDF " Jan Kara
2011-10-06 23:08 ` NamJae Jeon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111004145156.GA4183@joi.lan \
--to=marcin.slusarz@gmail.com \
--cc=amit.sahrawat83@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox