From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah.khan@hp.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH] x86_32: Call do_notify_resume() with interrupts enabled
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 22:58:35 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111005172835.GA17591@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
do_notify_resume() gets called with interrupts disabled on x86_32. This
is different from the x86_64 behavior, where interrupts are enabled at
the time.
Queries on lkml on this issue hasn't yielded any clear answer. Lets make
x86_32 behave the same as x86_64, unless there is a real reason to
maintain status quo.
Please refer https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/27/130 for more details
My 32-bit machine works fine (tm) with the patch below
Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S | 2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S
index f3f6f53..29d72ca 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S
@@ -625,6 +625,7 @@ work_notifysig: # deal with pending signals and
movl %esp, %eax
jne work_notifysig_v86 # returning to kernel-space or
# vm86-space
+ ENABLE_INTERRUPTS(CLBR_NONE)
xorl %edx, %edx
call do_notify_resume
jmp resume_userspace_sig
@@ -638,6 +639,7 @@ work_notifysig: # deal with pending signals and
#else
movl %esp, %eax
#endif
+ ENABLE_INTERRUPTS(CLBR_NONE)
xorl %edx, %edx
call do_notify_resume
jmp resume_userspace_sig
reply other threads:[~2011-10-05 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111005172835.GA17591@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jkenisto@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=roland@hack.frob.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shuah.khan@hp.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox