public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] RFC: ->make_request support for virtio-blk
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 17:53:30 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111005215330.GA13514@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111005203116.GM30146@redhat.com>

On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 04:31:16PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> So you no longer believe that request queue overhead can be brought
> down to mangeable levels for these fast devices. And instead go for
> bio based drivers and give up on merging and implement own FLUSH/FUA
> machinery.

Not in a reasonable time frame. Having a common interface is still the
grand plan, but the virtio performance issues are hurting people so
badly that we need a fix soon.


      reply	other threads:[~2011-10-05 21:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-05 19:54 [PATCH 0/5] RFC: ->make_request support for virtio-blk Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-05 19:54 ` [PATCH 1/5] block: add bio_map_sg Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-05 22:51   ` Boaz Harrosh
2011-10-06 13:40     ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-05 19:54 ` [PATCH 2/5] virtio: support unlocked queue kick Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-06  8:42   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
     [not found]   ` <87r52qgaf3.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
2011-10-06 13:19     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-01 14:40       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-02  3:19         ` Rusty Russell
2011-11-02  7:25           ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-03  4:01             ` Rusty Russell
2011-11-03  5:15               ` Rusty Russell
2011-11-03  6:45   ` Minchan Kim
2011-10-05 19:54 ` [PATCH 3/5] virtio-blk: remove the unused list of pending requests Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-05 19:54 ` [PATCH 4/5] virtio-blk: reimplement the serial attribute without using requests Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-05 19:54 ` [PATCH 5/5] virtio-blk: implement ->make_request Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-06  1:52   ` Rusty Russell
2011-10-06 13:42     ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-06 13:53   ` Jens Axboe
2011-10-05 20:31 ` [PATCH 0/5] RFC: ->make_request support for virtio-blk Vivek Goyal
2011-10-05 21:53   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111005215330.GA13514@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox