From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758211Ab1JFHKz (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Oct 2011 03:10:55 -0400 Received: from e38.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.159]:47937 "EHLO e38.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755720Ab1JFHKx (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Oct 2011 03:10:53 -0400 Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 12:23:26 +0530 From: Srikar Dronamraju To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Steven Rostedt , Linux-mm , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Linus Torvalds , Jonathan Corbet , Hugh Dickins , Christoph Hellwig , Masami Hiramatsu , Thomas Gleixner , Andi Kleen , LKML , Jim Keniston , Roland McGrath , Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3.1.0-rc4-tip 9/26] Uprobes: Background page replacement. Message-ID: <20111006065326.GD17591@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: Srikar Dronamraju References: <20110920115938.25326.93059.sendpatchset@srdronam.in.ibm.com> <20110920120137.25326.72005.sendpatchset@srdronam.in.ibm.com> <20111005161914.GA903@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111005161914.GA903@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Oleg Nesterov [2011-10-05 18:19:14]: > On 09/20, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > > > > +int __weak read_opcode(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long vaddr, > > + uprobe_opcode_t *opcode) > > +{ > > + struct vm_area_struct *vma; > > + struct page *page; > > + void *vaddr_new; > > + int ret; > > + > > + ret = get_user_pages(tsk, tsk->mm, vaddr, 1, 0, 0, &page, &vma); > > + if (ret <= 0) > > + return ret; > > + ret = -EINVAL; > > + > > + /* > > + * We are interested in text pages only. Our pages of interest > > + * should be mapped for read and execute only. We desist from > > + * adding probes in write mapped pages since the breakpoints > > + * might end up in the file copy. > > + */ > > + if (!valid_vma(vma)) > > + goto put_out; > > Another case when valid_vma() looks suspicious. We are going to restore > the original instruction. We shouldn't fail (at least we shouldn't "leak" > ->mm_uprobes_count) if ->vm_flags was changed between register_uprobe() > and unregister_uprobe(). > Agree. -- Thanks and Regards Srikar