* [PATCH v3] [SIGNED-OFF] ext4: don't work without procfs
@ 2011-10-06 15:51 Fabrice Jouhaud
2011-10-06 16:01 ` Joe Perches
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Fabrice Jouhaud @ 2011-10-06 15:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4; +Cc: tytso, adilger.kernel, linux-kernel, Yargil
From: Yargil <yargil@free.fr>
Regression from commit dd68314ccf3fb918c1fb6471817edbc60ece4b52
The problem come from the test of the return value of proc_mkdir
that is always false without procfs and abort the init of ext4.
Signed-off-by: Fabrice Jouhaud <yargil@free.fr>
---
fs/ext4/super.c | 2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index 44d0c8d..9b51b17 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -4985,8 +4985,10 @@ static int __init ext4_init_fs(void)
if (!ext4_kset)
goto out6;
ext4_proc_root = proc_mkdir("fs/ext4", NULL);
+#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
if (!ext4_proc_root)
goto out5;
+#endif
err = ext4_init_feat_adverts();
if (err)
--
1.7.2.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] [SIGNED-OFF] ext4: don't work without procfs
2011-10-06 15:51 [PATCH v3] [SIGNED-OFF] ext4: don't work without procfs Fabrice Jouhaud
@ 2011-10-06 16:01 ` Joe Perches
2011-10-06 16:44 ` Ted Ts'o
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Joe Perches @ 2011-10-06 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fabrice Jouhaud; +Cc: linux-ext4, tytso, adilger.kernel, linux-kernel
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 17:51 +0200, Fabrice Jouhaud wrote:
> From: Yargil <yargil@free.fr>
It would be better to use your full name on the "From: " line
> Regression from commit dd68314ccf3fb918c1fb6471817edbc60ece4b52
> The problem come from the test of the return value of proc_mkdir
> that is always false without procfs and abort the init of ext4.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabrice Jouhaud <yargil@free.fr>
> ---
> fs/ext4/super.c | 2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> index 44d0c8d..9b51b17 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> @@ -4985,8 +4985,10 @@ static int __init ext4_init_fs(void)
> if (!ext4_kset)
> goto out6;
> ext4_proc_root = proc_mkdir("fs/ext4", NULL);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
> if (!ext4_proc_root)
> goto out5;
> +#endif
It would make more sense as:
+#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
ext4_proc_root = proc_mkdir("fs/ext4", NULL);
if (!ext4_proc_root)
goto out5;
+#endif
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] [SIGNED-OFF] ext4: don't work without procfs
2011-10-06 16:01 ` Joe Perches
@ 2011-10-06 16:44 ` Ted Ts'o
2011-10-06 18:44 ` Olaf Titz
2011-10-07 8:30 ` Lukas Czerner
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ted Ts'o @ 2011-10-06 16:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joe Perches; +Cc: Fabrice Jouhaud, linux-ext4, adilger.kernel, linux-kernel
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 09:01:18AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 17:51 +0200, Fabrice Jouhaud wrote:
> > From: Yargil <yargil@free.fr>
>
> It would be better to use your full name on the "From: " line
In fact, in these cases I will normally copy the full name from
Signed-off-by to the From line before applying the patch. (In general
the signed-off-by line and the From line should have the same contents.)
- Ted
P.S. Helpful tip: if you use emacs, try putting something like this
in your .emacs.el file:
(defun insert-signed-off-by ()
(interactive)
(insert "Signed-off-by: Fabrice Jouhaud" <yargil@free.fr>\n"))
(global-set-key "\^Cs" 'insert-signed-off-by)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] [SIGNED-OFF] ext4: don't work without procfs
2011-10-06 16:01 ` Joe Perches
2011-10-06 16:44 ` Ted Ts'o
@ 2011-10-06 18:44 ` Olaf Titz
2011-10-07 8:30 ` Lukas Czerner
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Olaf Titz @ 2011-10-06 18:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
> It would make more sense as:
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
> ext4_proc_root = proc_mkdir("fs/ext4", NULL);
> if (!ext4_proc_root)
> goto out5;
> +#endif
Looks right, but even more logical would be to guard _all_ usage of
ext4_proc_root (and, consequently, the declaration thereof) in #ifdef
CONFIG_PROC_FS. Now it's at least necessary to always do null checks.
Olaf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] [SIGNED-OFF] ext4: don't work without procfs
2011-10-06 16:01 ` Joe Perches
2011-10-06 16:44 ` Ted Ts'o
2011-10-06 18:44 ` Olaf Titz
@ 2011-10-07 8:30 ` Lukas Czerner
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Lukas Czerner @ 2011-10-07 8:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joe Perches
Cc: Fabrice Jouhaud, linux-ext4, tytso, adilger.kernel, linux-kernel
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 17:51 +0200, Fabrice Jouhaud wrote:
> > From: Yargil <yargil@free.fr>
>
> It would be better to use your full name on the "From: " line
>
> > Regression from commit dd68314ccf3fb918c1fb6471817edbc60ece4b52
> > The problem come from the test of the return value of proc_mkdir
> > that is always false without procfs and abort the init of ext4.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fabrice Jouhaud <yargil@free.fr>
> > ---
> > fs/ext4/super.c | 2 ++
> > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> > index 44d0c8d..9b51b17 100644
> > --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> > +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> > @@ -4985,8 +4985,10 @@ static int __init ext4_init_fs(void)
> > if (!ext4_kset)
> > goto out6;
> > ext4_proc_root = proc_mkdir("fs/ext4", NULL);
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
> > if (!ext4_proc_root)
> > goto out5;
> > +#endif
>
> It would make more sense as:
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
> ext4_proc_root = proc_mkdir("fs/ext4", NULL);
> if (!ext4_proc_root)
> goto out5;
> +#endif
Actually it does not really matter, important is not to check the
condition in case that proc is not configured in.
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-10-07 8:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-10-06 15:51 [PATCH v3] [SIGNED-OFF] ext4: don't work without procfs Fabrice Jouhaud
2011-10-06 16:01 ` Joe Perches
2011-10-06 16:44 ` Ted Ts'o
2011-10-06 18:44 ` Olaf Titz
2011-10-07 8:30 ` Lukas Czerner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox