From: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>,
Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>,
Jan Glauber <jang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Xen Devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>,
peterz@infradead.org, rth@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V2 3/5] jump_label: if a key has already been initialized, don't nop it out
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 14:10:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111006181055.GA2505@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E8DEB19.1050509@goop.org>
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 10:53:29AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 10/05/2011 05:17 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > On 10/05/2011 05:16 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> >> On 10/04/2011 09:30 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >>> On 10/04/2011 07:10 AM, Jason Baron wrote:
> >>>> 1) The jmp +0, is a 'safe' no-op that I know is going to initially
> >>>> boot for all x86. I'm not sure if there is a 5-byte nop that works on
> >>>> all x86 variants - but by using jmp +0, we make it much easier to debug
> >>>> cases where we may be using broken no-ops.
> >>>>
> >>> There are *plenty*. jmp+0 is about as pessimal as you can get.
> >> As an aside, do you know if a 2-byte unconditional jmp is any more
> >> efficient than 5-byte, aside from just being a smaller instruction and
> >> taking less icache?
> >>
> > I don't know for sure, no. I probably depends on the CPU.
>
> Looks like jmp2 is about 5% faster than jmp5 on Sandybridge with this
> benchmark.
>
> But insignificant difference on Nehalem.
>
> J
It would be cool if we could make the total width 2-bytes, when
possible. It might be possible by making the initial 'JUMP_LABEL_INITIAL_NOP'
as a 'jmp' to the 'l_yes' label. And then patching that with a no-op at boot
time or link time - letting the compiler pick the width. In that way we could
get the optimal width...
thanks,
-Jason
> #include <stdio.h>
>
> struct {
> unsigned char flag;
> unsigned char val;
> } l;
>
> #define JMP2 asm volatile ("jmp 1f; .byte 0x0f,0x1f,0x00; 1: ");
> #define JMPJMP2 JMP2 JMP2
> #define JMPJMPJMP2 JMPJMP2 JMPJMP2
> #define JMPJMPJMP2 JMPJMP2 JMPJMP2
> #define JMPJMPJMPJMP2 JMPJMPJMP2 JMPJMPJMP2
> #define JMPJMPJMPJMPJMP2 JMPJMPJMPJMP2 JMPJMPJMPJMP2
> #define JMPJMPJMPJMPJMPJMP2 JMPJMPJMPJMPJMP2 JMPJMPJMPJMPJMP2
>
> int main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> int i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < 100000000; i++) {
> JMPJMPJMPJMPJMPJMP2;
> asm volatile("" : : : "memory");
> }
>
> return 0;
> }
> #include <stdio.h>
>
> struct {
> unsigned char flag;
> unsigned char val;
> } l;
>
> #define JMP5 asm volatile (".byte 0xe9; .long 0");
> #define JMPJMP5 JMP5 JMP5
> #define JMPJMPJMP5 JMPJMP5 JMPJMP5
> #define JMPJMPJMP5 JMPJMP5 JMPJMP5
> #define JMPJMPJMPJMP5 JMPJMPJMP5 JMPJMPJMP5
> #define JMPJMPJMPJMPJMP5 JMPJMPJMPJMP5 JMPJMPJMPJMP5
> #define JMPJMPJMPJMPJMPJMP5 JMPJMPJMPJMPJMP5 JMPJMPJMPJMPJMP5
>
> int main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> int i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < 100000000; i++) {
> JMPJMPJMPJMPJMPJMP5;
> asm volatile("" : : : "memory");
> }
>
> return 0;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-06 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-01 21:55 [PATCH RFC V2 0/5] jump-label: allow early jump_label_enable() Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-10-01 21:55 ` [PATCH RFC V2 1/5] jump_label: use proper atomic_t initializer Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-10-01 21:55 ` [PATCH RFC V2 2/5] stop_machine: make stop_machine safe and efficient to call early Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-10-02 0:36 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-03 19:24 ` [Xen-devel] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-10-01 21:55 ` [PATCH RFC V2 3/5] jump_label: if a key has already been initialized, don't nop it out Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-10-03 15:02 ` Jason Baron
2011-10-03 15:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-10-03 16:27 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-10-04 14:10 ` Jason Baron
2011-10-04 15:18 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-10-04 16:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-10-04 17:53 ` Jason Baron
2011-10-04 18:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-10-06 0:16 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-10-06 0:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-10-06 0:47 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-10-06 17:53 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-10-06 18:10 ` Jason Baron [this message]
2011-10-06 18:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-10-06 21:39 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-10-06 22:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-10-06 18:15 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-10-06 18:33 ` Jason Baron
2011-10-06 18:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-10-06 18:43 ` Jason Baron
2011-10-06 18:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-10-06 18:29 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-10-06 18:38 ` Jason Baron
2011-10-06 19:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-10-06 20:33 ` Jason Baron
2011-10-06 20:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-10-06 18:50 ` Richard Henderson
2011-10-06 19:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-10-06 21:42 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-10-06 22:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-10-06 22:10 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-10-06 22:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-10-07 17:09 ` [PATCH][RFC] jump_labels/x86: Use either 5 byte or 2 byte jumps Steven Rostedt
2011-10-07 18:52 ` Jason Baron
2011-10-07 19:21 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-10-07 21:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-10-07 22:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-10-07 22:03 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-10-07 19:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-10-07 19:40 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-10-07 19:58 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-10-07 20:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-10 15:36 ` [PATCH RFC V2 3/5] jump_label: if a key has already been initialized, don't nop it out Jason Baron
2011-10-10 19:58 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-10-10 20:10 ` Jason Baron
2011-10-01 21:55 ` [PATCH RFC V2 4/5] x86/jump_label: drop arch_jump_label_text_poke_early() Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-10-01 21:55 ` [PATCH RFC V2 5/5] sparc/jump_label: " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111006181055.GA2505@redhat.com \
--to=jbaron@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david.daney@cavium.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jang@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rth@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox