From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965447Ab1JGLhK (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Oct 2011 07:37:10 -0400 Received: from 8bytes.org ([88.198.83.132]:39103 "EHLO 8bytes.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965366Ab1JGLhJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Oct 2011 07:37:09 -0400 Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 13:37:01 +0200 From: Joerg Roedel To: KyongHo Cho Cc: "Roedel, Joerg" , Kukjin Kim , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Russell King , Ohad Ben-Cohen , Sanghyun Lee , "younglak1004.kim@samsung.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] iommu/exynos: Use bus_set_iommu instead of register_iommu Message-ID: <20111007113701.GC1512@8bytes.org> References: <017001cc7f43$04a2db60$0de89220$%kim@samsung.com> <20110930134643.GS2138@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 08:52:45AM +0900, KyongHo Cho wrote: > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Roedel, Joerg wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 03:31:49AM -0400, Kukjin Kim wrote: > >> From: KyongHo Cho > >> > >> This replaces register_iommu() with bus_set_iommu() according to the > >> suggestion of Joerg Roedel. > > > > This should be part of patch 3 already when the bus_set_iommu() change > > is merged. Otherwise it breaks bisectability too. > > > Ok. > Should I include fault handling feature (patch 4) in the patch 3 also? Yes, makes sense to include patch 4 too.