From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andy Henroid <andrew.d.henroid@intel.com>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>,
Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,
Hans-Christian Egtvedt <hans-christian.egtvedt@atmel.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] rcu: Detect illegal uses of RCU in idle and fix some v5
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 16:32:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111007233235.GJ2696@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1318004530-705-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 06:21:59PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Here is the rebase. And it's more than just a rebase given the
> semantical changes after your patch that tracks idleness. And also
> because of the new API naming (with a new pair of tick_nohz_idle_enter()
> tick_nohz_idle_exit() with *_norcu suffixes).
>
> I have reused and updated some comments (that you made on earlier
> versions of my patchset) that assumed that extended qs = dynticks
> idle, as it's not always true anymore. I've tried to bring a new
> wording to express what we are dealing with: "RCU-free window in idle"
> or "RCU-idle window". I let you update the comments if you think
> that's confusing or too scarce.
>
> It has passed several hours of rcutorture with NO_HZ && SMP, and at least
> booted fine with all your configs.
Thank you, Frederic! I have queued these locally and will start
testing them.
Thanx, Paul
> Frederic Weisbecker (9):
> rcu: Detect illegal rcu dereference in extended quiescent state
> rcu: Inform the user about extended quiescent state on PROVE_RCU warning
> rcu: Warn when rcu_read_lock() is used in extended quiescent state
> rcu: Make srcu_read_lock_held() call common lockdep-enabled function
> nohz: Separate out irq exit and idle loop dyntick logic
> nohz: Allow rcu extended quiescent state handling seperately from tick stop
> x86: Enter rcu extended qs after idle notifier call
> x86: Call idle notifier after irq_enter()
> rcu: Fix early call to rcu_idle_enter()
>
> Paul E. McKenney (2):
> rcu: Remove one layer of abstraction from PROVE_RCU checking
> rcu: Warn when srcu_read_lock() is used in an extended quiescent state
>
> arch/arm/kernel/process.c | 4 +-
> arch/avr32/kernel/process.c | 4 +-
> arch/blackfin/kernel/process.c | 4 +-
> arch/microblaze/kernel/process.c | 4 +-
> arch/mips/kernel/process.c | 4 +-
> arch/openrisc/kernel/idle.c | 4 +-
> arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c | 4 +-
> arch/powerpc/platforms/iseries/setup.c | 8 +-
> arch/s390/kernel/process.c | 4 +-
> arch/sh/kernel/idle.c | 4 +-
> arch/sparc/kernel/process_64.c | 4 +-
> arch/tile/kernel/process.c | 4 +-
> arch/um/kernel/process.c | 4 +-
> arch/unicore32/kernel/process.c | 4 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c | 6 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/threshold.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/irq.c | 6 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c | 4 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 10 +++-
> include/linux/rcupdate.h | 74 +++++++++++++++--------
> include/linux/srcu.h | 38 ++++++++----
> include/linux/tick.h | 52 ++++++++++++++--
> kernel/lockdep.c | 22 +++++++
> kernel/rcupdate.c | 4 +
> kernel/rcutiny.c | 1 +
> kernel/rcutree.c | 19 +++++-
> kernel/softirq.c | 4 +-
> kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 30 files changed, 273 insertions(+), 129 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.7.5.4
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-07 23:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-07 16:21 [PATCH 00/11] rcu: Detect illegal uses of RCU in idle and fix some v5 Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-07 16:22 ` [PATCH 01/11] rcu: Detect illegal rcu dereference in extended quiescent state Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-07 16:22 ` [PATCH 02/11] rcu: Inform the user about extended quiescent state on PROVE_RCU warning Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-07 22:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-10-07 16:22 ` [PATCH 03/11] rcu: Warn when rcu_read_lock() is used in extended quiescent state Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-07 16:22 ` [PATCH 04/11] rcu: Remove one layer of abstraction from PROVE_RCU checking Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-07 16:22 ` [PATCH 05/11] rcu: Warn when srcu_read_lock() is used in an extended quiescent state Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-07 16:22 ` [PATCH 06/11] rcu: Make srcu_read_lock_held() call common lockdep-enabled function Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-07 16:22 ` [PATCH 07/11] nohz: Separate out irq exit and idle loop dyntick logic Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-07 16:22 ` [PATCH 08/11] nohz: Allow rcu extended quiescent state handling seperately from tick stop Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-08 13:43 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-08 14:01 ` [PATCH 08/11 v2] " Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-13 6:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-10-13 7:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-10-13 12:50 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-13 22:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-10-14 12:08 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-14 17:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-10-16 13:28 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-17 2:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-10-07 16:22 ` [PATCH 09/11] x86: Enter rcu extended qs after idle notifier call Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-07 16:22 ` [PATCH 10/11] x86: Call idle notifier after irq_enter() Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-07 16:22 ` [PATCH 11/11] rcu: Fix early call to rcu_idle_enter() Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-07 23:32 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111007233235.GJ2696@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=andrew.d.henroid@intel.com \
--cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn \
--cc=hans-christian.egtvedt@atmel.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox