From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753283Ab1JHP4C (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Oct 2011 11:56:02 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:49710 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753008Ab1JHPzh (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Oct 2011 11:55:37 -0400 Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2011 08:47:34 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Mark Einon Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, davem@davemloft.net, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: et131x: Moving the et131x driver out of staging? (a.k.a. filling up the TODO list again) Message-ID: <20111008154734.GA559@suse.de> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 11:07:00PM +0100, Mark Einon wrote: > Hello Greg, > > I've managed to clear out the current TODO list for the staging/et131x > driver, and hopefully its looking in a much better shape because of > it. It is, thanks for the work. > I'd like to propose moving it out of the staging area, or at least > getting some review comments regarding what work is still needed. I think you got some comments and have a bit more work to do now, right? > Is it a good time to propose this bearing in mind the reorganisation > of drivers/net/ and the fallout from the kernel.org issues? I don't think either of those have any bearing on this, does it? thanks, greg k-h