public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	Christophe Saout <christophe@saout.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Block regression since 3.1-rc3
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2011 12:14:21 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111008161421.GA5743@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANejiEXnXJ7LkyqHyH1S2c4A95Si7v0-gDmRD824r3ROntaDCA@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Oct 08 2011 at  7:02am -0400,
Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org> wrote:

> Looks the dm request based flush logic is broken.
> 
> saved_make_request_fn
>   __make_request
>     blk_insert_flush
> but blk_insert_flush doesn't put the original request to list, instead, the
> q->flush_rq is in list.
> then
> dm_request_fn
>   blk_peek_request
>     dm_prep_fn
>       clone_rq
>   map_request
>     blk_insert_cloned_request
> so q->flush_rq is cloned, and get dispatched. but we can't clone q->flush_rq
> and use it to do flush. map_request even could assign a different blockdev to
> the cloned request.

You haven't explained why cloning q->flush_rq is broken.  What is the
problem with map_request changing the blockdev?  For the purposes of
request-based DM the flush machinery has already managed the processing
of the flush at the higher level request_queue.

By the time request-based DM is cloning a flush request it really has no
need to reenter the flush machinery (even though Tejun wants it to --
but in practice it doesn't buy us anything because we never stack
request-based DM at the moment.  Instead it showcases how brittle this
path is).

> Clone q->flush_rq is absolutely wrong.

I'm still missing the _why_.

Taking a step back:

Unless others have an immediate ah-ha moment, I'd suggest we revert
commit 4853abaae7e4a2a (block: fix flush machinery for stacking drivers
with differring flush flags).  Whereby avoiding unnecessarily reentering
the flush machinery.

If commit ed8b752bccf256 (dm table: set flush capability based on
underlying devices) is in place the flush gets fed directly to
scsi_request_fn, which is fine because the request-based DM's
request_queue's flush_flags reflect the flush capabilities of the
underlying device(s).

We are then covered relative to the only request-based DM use-case
people care about (e.g. dm-multipath, which doesn't use stacked
request-based DM).

We can revisit upholding the purity of the flush machinery for stacked
devices in >= 3.2.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-10-08 16:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-30 15:51 Block regression since 3.1-rc3 Christophe Saout
2011-09-30 18:02 ` [dm-devel] " Christophe Saout
2011-10-03 14:43 ` Jeff Moyer
2011-10-04 12:02   ` Christophe Saout
2011-10-04 13:32     ` Jeff Moyer
2011-10-04 15:06       ` Christophe Saout
2011-10-06 19:51     ` Jeff Moyer
2011-10-06 22:02       ` Christophe Saout
2011-10-08 11:02       ` Shaohua Li
2011-10-08 12:05         ` Christophe Saout
2011-10-09  4:26           ` Shaohua Li
2011-11-01  4:54           ` illdred
2011-10-08 16:14         ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2011-10-09  4:31           ` Shaohua Li
2011-10-09  7:16             ` Shaohua Li
2011-10-09  8:12               ` Christophe Saout
2011-10-09 13:47                 ` Christophe Saout
2011-10-10 21:33           ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-11 19:56             ` Mike Snitzer
2011-10-11 20:52               ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-11 22:07                 ` Jeff Moyer
2011-10-09  8:08       ` [dm-devel] " Shaohua Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111008161421.GA5743@redhat.com \
    --to=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=christophe@saout.de \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shli@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox