public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Subject: Re: Please revert "debug: Make CONFIG_EXPERT select CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL to unhide debug options"
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 09:29:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111010072946.GA29035@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110930155012.GC9049@localhost.pp.htv.fi>

* Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 08:05:19AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 04:42:45PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >...
> > > Let me point at the obvious fact that both CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE and 
> > > CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA do depend on DEBUG_KERNEL, and are contrary to the 
> > > claim of the author of this patch never enabled with 
> > > CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL=n. [1]
> > 
> > Not true:
> > 
> > ~/src/linux-2.6$ rm .config
> > ~/src/linux-2.6$ make allnoconfig
> >   HOSTCC  scripts/basic/fixdep
> >   HOSTCC  scripts/kconfig/conf.o
> >   HOSTCC  scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.o
> >   HOSTLD  scripts/kconfig/conf
> > scripts/kconfig/conf --allnoconfig Kconfig
> > #
> > # configuration written to .config
> > #
> > ~/src/linux-2.6$ grep BUGVERBOSE .config
> > CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE=y
> > ~/src/linux-2.6$ grep DEBUG_KERNEL .config
> > # CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL is not set
> > 
> > DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE does not depend on DEBUG_KERNEL; it just only shows up
> > with DEBUG_KERNEL (and EXPERT) set.  The *description* has a conditional
> > on DEBUG_KERNEL and EXPERT:
> > 
> > config DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE
> >         bool "Verbose BUG() reporting (adds 70K)" if DEBUG_KERNEL && EXPERT
> >...
> 
> Apologies, I was wrong on DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE
> (but for DEBUG_RODATA I was right).

I think you are wrong not just about that detail but about the whole 
premise of your complaint as well:

>  config DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE
> -	bool "Verbose BUG() reporting (adds 70K)" if DEBUG_KERNEL && EXPERT
> +	bool "Verbose BUG() reporting (adds 70K)" if EXPERT
> 
> This part of the patch would have been the correct and complete 
> solution for DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE.

Not really - it's a debugging-only option and when i turn on 
CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL I expect to have full config control over all 
debug options - with sane defaults provided.

I definitely don't want a debugging option to depend on 
CONFIG_EXPERT.

CONFIG_EXPERT is a superset to all that: it implies config control 
over all debug options *and* over many other kernel components as 
well.

This is a pretty easy model to think about.

> The crazy select added in commit f505c553 is wrong.

Why? Your original message does not explain it.

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2011-10-10  7:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-30 13:42 Please revert "debug: Make CONFIG_EXPERT select CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL to unhide debug options" Adrian Bunk
2011-09-30 15:05 ` Josh Triplett
2011-09-30 15:25   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-09-30 15:32     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-09-30 15:54     ` Adrian Bunk
2011-09-30 15:50   ` Adrian Bunk
2011-10-10  7:29     ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2011-10-10  8:48       ` Adrian Bunk
2011-10-10  9:44         ` Mike Galbraith
2011-10-10 10:21         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-10 12:13           ` Adrian Bunk
2011-10-12  8:38             ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-20 21:41               ` Adrian Bunk
2011-10-21  8:19                 ` Michal Marek
2011-10-21  9:22                   ` Adrian Bunk
2011-10-21 12:37                     ` Michal Marek
2011-10-21 16:12                       ` Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111010072946.GA29035@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox