From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Lutomirski <luto@mit.edu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [3.1 patch] x86: default to vsyscall=native
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 13:48:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111010114840.GC17079@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFLxGvx0QMrvG_ZsFE6C_xHn9JpWJ-aW-V=K9pm3OoXZc=NKxQ@mail.gmail.com>
* richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com> wrote:
> From UML's point of view the current situation is odd. UML will no
> longer run on top of a default 3.1 kernel.
This needs to be fixed (perhaps worked around in UML if that's
possible and if you agree with that) - or barring a real obvious fix
needs to be reverted to the last-known-working state. We are in -rc9
so nothing but really, really obvious patches can be applied.
> Why is this odd? One of the major reasons why people are still
> using UML is because you can run it as non-privileged user on any
> x86 Linux host. An user which has root privileges can setup and use
> KVM which is much nicer than UML...
No, your complaint is entirely justified.
Andrew?
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-10 11:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-03 9:08 [3.1 patch] x86: default to vsyscall=native Adrian Bunk
2011-10-03 13:04 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-10-03 17:33 ` Adrian Bunk
2011-10-03 18:06 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-10-03 18:41 ` Adrian Bunk
2011-10-05 22:13 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-10-05 22:22 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2011-10-05 22:30 ` Adrian Bunk
2011-10-05 22:41 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2011-10-05 22:46 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-10-05 23:36 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-10-06 3:06 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-10-06 12:12 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2011-10-06 15:37 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2011-10-06 18:16 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-10-06 18:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-07 0:48 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-10-10 11:19 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2011-10-10 11:48 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2011-10-10 15:31 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-10-11 6:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-11 17:24 ` [RFC] fixing the UML failure root cause Andrew Lutomirski
2011-10-13 6:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-13 8:40 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-10-14 4:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-14 6:30 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-10-14 20:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-21 21:01 ` [PATCH] x86-64: Set siginfo and context on vsyscall emulation faults Andy Lutomirski
2011-10-22 4:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-22 9:07 ` Andy Lutomirski
2011-11-08 0:33 ` [PATCH 0/2] Fix and re-enable vsyscall=emulate Andy Lutomirski
2011-11-08 0:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86-64: Set siginfo and context on vsyscall emulation faults Andy Lutomirski
2011-12-05 13:23 ` [tip:x86/asm] " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2011-11-08 0:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86: Default to vsyscall=emulate Andy Lutomirski
2011-12-05 13:24 ` [tip:x86/asm] " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2011-12-02 22:47 ` [PATCH 0/2] Fix and re-enable vsyscall=emulate Andy Lutomirski
2011-12-05 11:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-10-14 19:53 ` [RFC] fixing the UML failure root cause richard -rw- weinberger
2011-10-14 20:17 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-10-14 20:23 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2011-10-14 20:31 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-10-14 20:39 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2011-10-14 22:28 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2011-10-15 16:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-05 22:24 ` [3.1 patch] x86: default to vsyscall=native Adrian Bunk
2011-10-03 13:19 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2011-10-03 17:46 ` Adrian Bunk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-10-05 21:40 Adrian Bunk
2011-10-05 22:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-10-09 13:45 ` Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111010114840.GC17079@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@mit.edu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=richard.weinberger@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox