linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz" <a.miskiewicz@gmail.com>
To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Debora Velarde <debora@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Marcel Selhorst <m.selhorst@sirrix.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 3.1-rc9
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 23:08:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201110102308.43145.a.miskiewicz@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201110101957.25322.a.miskiewicz@gmail.com>

On Monday 10 of October 2011, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
> On Monday 10 of October 2011, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > On 10/10/2011 01:05 PM, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
> > > On Monday 10 of October 2011, Rajiv Andrade wrote:
> > >> On 09/10/11 23:29, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > >>> On 10/09/2011 04:51 PM, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
> > >>>> On Wednesday 05 of October 2011, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > >>>>> Another week, another -rc.
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> suspend to ram regression is annoying (still visible on rc9;
> > >>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/24/76) but unfortunately maintainers
> > >>>> are silent.
> > >>> 
> > >>> I tried -rc9 on my Lenovo W500 with that same TPM. I cannot reproduce
> > >>> the 'scheduling while atomic' problem you had reported earlier. I
> > >>> also could suspend / resume fine as long as I did the following:
> > >>> 
> > >>> - suspended with the tpm_tis driver as module in the kernel
> > >>> - once a suspend was done without the tpm_tis driver the subsequent
> > >>> suspends were all done without the tpm_tis driver
> > >>> 
> > >>> Once I had done a suspend/resume with the tpm_tis driver *not* in the
> > >>> kernel and then again a suspend with the tpm_tis driver in the
> > >>> kernel, it did not resume anymore. I believe previously (previous
> > >>> version of kernel and/or Fedora) it refused to even suspend. The
> > >>> reason why this doesn't work properly is that the driver has to send
> > >>> a command to the TPM upon suspend and the BIOS then sends the
> > >>> corresponding wakeup command.
> > >>> 
> > >>> Did you maybe previously suspend/resume without a tpm_tis driver and
> > >>> then try to suspend with it ?
> > >>> 
> > >>> Also, my Lenovo W500 shows particularly odd behavior when I switch
> > >>> from Windows to Linux. The first suspend with a Linux booted after
> > >>> Windows (with or without tpm_tis driver) does *not* resume (reboot
> > >>> required). A subsequently rebooted Linux makes the suspend/resume
> > >>> work fine.
> > >>> 
> > >>>     Stefan
> > >> 
> > >> Arkadiusz,
> > >> 
> > >> Do you still see the issue with this patch [1][2] applied?
> > > 
> > > The issue doesn't happen with this patch but error condition with
> > > "Could not read PCR 0. TPM is not working correctly." is triggered
> > > immediately at boot, even before suspend is used.
> > > 
> > > $ dmesg|grep -iE "(tpm|suspend)"
> > > [   12.640039] tpm_tis 00:0a: 1.2 TPM (device-id 0x1020, rev-id 6)
> > > [   12.640048] tpm_tis 00:0a: Intel iTPM workaround enabled
> > > [   12.768057] tpm_tis 00:0a: Could not read PCR 0. TPM is not working
> > > correctly.
> > > [   12.768066] tpm_tis 00:0a: Was machine previously suspended without
> > > TPM driver present?
> > > [   88.512117] Suspending console(s) (use no_console_suspend to debug)
> > 
> > Though I suppose that now your suspend/resume cycles always work?
> 
> Tried several times and it always worked, so probably yes. Longer testing
> will give definitive answer.
> 
> > I guess the BIOS seems not to be initializing the TPM correctly. Any
> > chance you can get a hold of a BIOS update for your machine?
> 
> Then I looked into bios options on this thinkpad t400 and there are 3
> possible TPM settings: Enabled, Invisible, Disabled.
> 
> Invisible is - visible but not working - according to bios help. No idea
> why such option exists but I had it enabled.
> 
> Right now I've set that to "Enabled" and ran few suspend/resume cycles - no
> problems so far.

Unfortunately TPM enabled in bios + kernel (3.1.0-rc9-00064-g65112dc-dirty) 
with the patch applied

[11629.922643] legacy_resume(): pnp_bus_resume+0x0/0x67 returns -19
[11629.922646] PM: Device 00:0a failed to resume: error -19


and there is no "Could not read PCR 0. TPM is not working correctly." message, 
so this check  doesn't seem to be good enough.

> 
> I guess there is some way to make "Invisible" mode properly handled in
> Linux, too.
> 
> >     Stefan


-- 
Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz        PLD/Linux Team
arekm / maven.pl            http://ftp.pld-linux.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2011-10-10 21:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 98+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-05  1:40 Linux 3.1-rc9 Linus Torvalds
2011-10-07  7:08 ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-07 17:48   ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-07 18:01     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-08  0:33       ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-08  0:50       ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-08  7:55         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-12 21:35           ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-13 23:25             ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-17  1:39               ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-17  4:58                 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-17  9:03                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-10-17 10:40                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-17 11:40                       ` Alan Cox
2011-10-17 18:49                     ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-17 20:35                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-10-17 21:19                         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-17 21:22                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-10-17 21:39                             ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-17 22:03                               ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-17 22:04                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-17 22:08                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-10-18  6:01                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-18  7:12                                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-10-18 18:50                                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-10-17 21:31                           ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-17  7:55                 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-10-17  9:12                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-17  9:18                     ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-10-17 20:48                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-10-18  7:20                     ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-10-17 10:34                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-17 14:07                   ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-10-17 14:57                   ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-17 17:54                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-17 18:31                       ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-17 19:23                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-17 21:00                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-10-18  8:39                             ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-10-18  9:05                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-18 14:59                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-18 15:26                                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-10-18 18:07                                   ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-18 18:14                                   ` [GIT PULL] timer fix Ingo Molnar
2011-10-18 16:13                                 ` Linux 3.1-rc9 Dave Jones
2011-10-18 18:20                                 ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-18 19:48                                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-10-18 20:12                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-25 15:26                                       ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-26  1:47                                         ` Yong Zhang
2011-10-24 19:02                                     ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-25  7:13                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-25  9:01                                         ` David Miller
2011-10-25 12:30                                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-10-25 23:18                                             ` David Miller
2011-10-25 20:20                                       ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-31 17:32                                         ` Simon Kirby
2011-11-02 16:40                                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-11-02 17:27                                             ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-02 17:46                                               ` Linus Torvalds
2011-11-02 17:53                                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-02 18:00                                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2011-11-02 18:05                                                     ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-02 18:10                                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2011-11-02 17:49                                               ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-02 17:58                                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-02 19:16                                                   ` Simon Kirby
2011-11-02 22:42                                                     ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-03  0:24                                                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-11-03  0:52                                                       ` Simon Kirby
2011-11-03 22:07                                                         ` David Miller
2011-11-03  6:06                                                       ` Jörg-Volker Peetz
2011-11-03  6:26                                                         ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-03  6:43                                                           ` David Miller
2011-11-02 17:54                                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-11-02 18:04                                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-02 18:28                                             ` Simon Kirby
2011-11-02 18:30                                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-11-02 22:10                                           ` Steven Rostedt
2011-11-02 23:00                                             ` Steven Rostedt
2011-11-03  0:09                                               ` Simon Kirby
2011-11-03  0:15                                                 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-11-03  0:17                                                   ` Simon Kirby
2011-11-18 23:11                                         ` [tip:perf/core] lockdep: Show subclass in pretty print of lockdep output tip-bot for Steven Rostedt
2011-10-20 14:36                 ` Linux 3.1-rc9 Martin Schwidefsky
2011-10-23 11:34                   ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-24  7:48                     ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-10-24  7:51                       ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-24  8:08                         ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-10-18  5:40             ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-09 20:51 ` Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
2011-10-10  2:29   ` [tpmdd-devel] " Stefan Berger
2011-10-10 16:23     ` Rajiv Andrade
2011-10-10 17:05       ` Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
2011-10-10 17:22         ` Stefan Berger
2011-10-10 17:57           ` Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
2011-10-10 21:08             ` Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz [this message]
2011-10-11  7:09             ` [tpmdd-devel] " Peter.Huewe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201110102308.43145.a.miskiewicz@gmail.com \
    --to=a.miskiewicz@gmail.com \
    --cc=debora@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.selhorst@sirrix.com \
    --cc=srajiv@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).