From: "Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz" <a.miskiewicz@gmail.com>
To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Debora Velarde <debora@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Marcel Selhorst <m.selhorst@sirrix.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 3.1-rc9
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 23:08:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201110102308.43145.a.miskiewicz@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201110101957.25322.a.miskiewicz@gmail.com>
On Monday 10 of October 2011, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
> On Monday 10 of October 2011, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > On 10/10/2011 01:05 PM, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
> > > On Monday 10 of October 2011, Rajiv Andrade wrote:
> > >> On 09/10/11 23:29, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > >>> On 10/09/2011 04:51 PM, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
> > >>>> On Wednesday 05 of October 2011, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > >>>>> Another week, another -rc.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> suspend to ram regression is annoying (still visible on rc9;
> > >>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/24/76) but unfortunately maintainers
> > >>>> are silent.
> > >>>
> > >>> I tried -rc9 on my Lenovo W500 with that same TPM. I cannot reproduce
> > >>> the 'scheduling while atomic' problem you had reported earlier. I
> > >>> also could suspend / resume fine as long as I did the following:
> > >>>
> > >>> - suspended with the tpm_tis driver as module in the kernel
> > >>> - once a suspend was done without the tpm_tis driver the subsequent
> > >>> suspends were all done without the tpm_tis driver
> > >>>
> > >>> Once I had done a suspend/resume with the tpm_tis driver *not* in the
> > >>> kernel and then again a suspend with the tpm_tis driver in the
> > >>> kernel, it did not resume anymore. I believe previously (previous
> > >>> version of kernel and/or Fedora) it refused to even suspend. The
> > >>> reason why this doesn't work properly is that the driver has to send
> > >>> a command to the TPM upon suspend and the BIOS then sends the
> > >>> corresponding wakeup command.
> > >>>
> > >>> Did you maybe previously suspend/resume without a tpm_tis driver and
> > >>> then try to suspend with it ?
> > >>>
> > >>> Also, my Lenovo W500 shows particularly odd behavior when I switch
> > >>> from Windows to Linux. The first suspend with a Linux booted after
> > >>> Windows (with or without tpm_tis driver) does *not* resume (reboot
> > >>> required). A subsequently rebooted Linux makes the suspend/resume
> > >>> work fine.
> > >>>
> > >>> Stefan
> > >>
> > >> Arkadiusz,
> > >>
> > >> Do you still see the issue with this patch [1][2] applied?
> > >
> > > The issue doesn't happen with this patch but error condition with
> > > "Could not read PCR 0. TPM is not working correctly." is triggered
> > > immediately at boot, even before suspend is used.
> > >
> > > $ dmesg|grep -iE "(tpm|suspend)"
> > > [ 12.640039] tpm_tis 00:0a: 1.2 TPM (device-id 0x1020, rev-id 6)
> > > [ 12.640048] tpm_tis 00:0a: Intel iTPM workaround enabled
> > > [ 12.768057] tpm_tis 00:0a: Could not read PCR 0. TPM is not working
> > > correctly.
> > > [ 12.768066] tpm_tis 00:0a: Was machine previously suspended without
> > > TPM driver present?
> > > [ 88.512117] Suspending console(s) (use no_console_suspend to debug)
> >
> > Though I suppose that now your suspend/resume cycles always work?
>
> Tried several times and it always worked, so probably yes. Longer testing
> will give definitive answer.
>
> > I guess the BIOS seems not to be initializing the TPM correctly. Any
> > chance you can get a hold of a BIOS update for your machine?
>
> Then I looked into bios options on this thinkpad t400 and there are 3
> possible TPM settings: Enabled, Invisible, Disabled.
>
> Invisible is - visible but not working - according to bios help. No idea
> why such option exists but I had it enabled.
>
> Right now I've set that to "Enabled" and ran few suspend/resume cycles - no
> problems so far.
Unfortunately TPM enabled in bios + kernel (3.1.0-rc9-00064-g65112dc-dirty)
with the patch applied
[11629.922643] legacy_resume(): pnp_bus_resume+0x0/0x67 returns -19
[11629.922646] PM: Device 00:0a failed to resume: error -19
and there is no "Could not read PCR 0. TPM is not working correctly." message,
so this check doesn't seem to be good enough.
>
> I guess there is some way to make "Invisible" mode properly handled in
> Linux, too.
>
> > Stefan
--
Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz PLD/Linux Team
arekm / maven.pl http://ftp.pld-linux.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-10 21:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 98+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-05 1:40 Linux 3.1-rc9 Linus Torvalds
2011-10-07 7:08 ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-07 17:48 ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-07 18:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-08 0:33 ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-08 0:50 ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-08 7:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-12 21:35 ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-13 23:25 ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-17 1:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-17 4:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-17 9:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-10-17 10:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-17 11:40 ` Alan Cox
2011-10-17 18:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-17 20:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-10-17 21:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-17 21:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-10-17 21:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-17 22:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-17 22:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-17 22:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-10-18 6:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-18 7:12 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-10-18 18:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-10-17 21:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-17 7:55 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-10-17 9:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-17 9:18 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-10-17 20:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-10-18 7:20 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-10-17 10:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-17 14:07 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-10-17 14:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-17 17:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-17 18:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-17 19:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-17 21:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-10-18 8:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-10-18 9:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-18 14:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-18 15:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-10-18 18:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-18 18:14 ` [GIT PULL] timer fix Ingo Molnar
2011-10-18 16:13 ` Linux 3.1-rc9 Dave Jones
2011-10-18 18:20 ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-18 19:48 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-10-18 20:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-25 15:26 ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-26 1:47 ` Yong Zhang
2011-10-24 19:02 ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-25 7:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-25 9:01 ` David Miller
2011-10-25 12:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-10-25 23:18 ` David Miller
2011-10-25 20:20 ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-31 17:32 ` Simon Kirby
2011-11-02 16:40 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-11-02 17:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-02 17:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-11-02 17:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-02 18:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-11-02 18:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-02 18:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-11-02 17:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-02 17:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-02 19:16 ` Simon Kirby
2011-11-02 22:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-03 0:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-11-03 0:52 ` Simon Kirby
2011-11-03 22:07 ` David Miller
2011-11-03 6:06 ` Jörg-Volker Peetz
2011-11-03 6:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-03 6:43 ` David Miller
2011-11-02 17:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-11-02 18:04 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-02 18:28 ` Simon Kirby
2011-11-02 18:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-11-02 22:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-11-02 23:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-11-03 0:09 ` Simon Kirby
2011-11-03 0:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-11-03 0:17 ` Simon Kirby
2011-11-18 23:11 ` [tip:perf/core] lockdep: Show subclass in pretty print of lockdep output tip-bot for Steven Rostedt
2011-10-20 14:36 ` Linux 3.1-rc9 Martin Schwidefsky
2011-10-23 11:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-24 7:48 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-10-24 7:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-24 8:08 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-10-18 5:40 ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-09 20:51 ` Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
2011-10-10 2:29 ` [tpmdd-devel] " Stefan Berger
2011-10-10 16:23 ` Rajiv Andrade
2011-10-10 17:05 ` Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
2011-10-10 17:22 ` Stefan Berger
2011-10-10 17:57 ` Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
2011-10-10 21:08 ` Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz [this message]
2011-10-11 7:09 ` [tpmdd-devel] " Peter.Huewe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201110102308.43145.a.miskiewicz@gmail.com \
--to=a.miskiewicz@gmail.com \
--cc=debora@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.selhorst@sirrix.com \
--cc=srajiv@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).