From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753282Ab1JJXYW (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:24:22 -0400 Received: from out3.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:54204 "EHLO out3.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752757Ab1JJXYV (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:24:21 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: uaWPls1HBzDSdJul/I3wqstuwS+iC3ZXT6idLFT3HjBB 1318289060 Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:24:03 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Andrew Morton Cc: Mel Gorman , linux-mm , LKML , nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: memory hotplug: Check if pages are correctly reserved on a per-section basis Message-ID: <20111010232403.GA30513@kroah.com> References: <20111010071119.GE6418@suse.de> <20111010150038.ac161977.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111010150038.ac161977.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 03:00:38PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:11:19 +0100 > Mel Gorman wrote: > > > It is expected that memory being brought online is PageReserved > > similar to what happens when the page allocator is being brought up. > > Memory is onlined in "memory blocks" which consist of one or more > > sections. Unfortunately, the code that verifies PageReserved is > > currently assuming that the memmap backing all these pages is virtually > > contiguous which is only the case when CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP is set. > > As a result, memory hot-add is failing on !VMEMMAP configurations > > with the message; > > > > kernel: section number XXX page number 256 not reserved, was it already online? > > > > This patch updates the PageReserved check to lookup struct page once > > per section to guarantee the correct struct page is being checked. > > > > Nathan's earlier version of this patch is already in linux-next, via > Greg. We should drop the old version and get the new one merged > instead. Ok, care to send me what exactly needs to be reverted and what needs to be added? thanks, greg k-h