linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, aradford@gmail.com,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.38.8 kernel bug in XFS or megaraid driver with heavy I/O load
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:35:26 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111012003526.GI3159@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111011141338.GA11808@otto.nzcorp.net>

On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 04:13:38PM +0200, Anders Ossowicki wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 03:34:48PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > This is core VM code, and operates purely on on-stack variables except
> > for the page cache radix tree nodes / pages.  So this either could be a
> > core VM bug that no one has noticed yet, or memory corruption.  Can you
> > run memtest86 on the box?
> 
> Unfortunately not, as it is a production server. Pulling it out to memtest 256G
> properly would take too long. But it seems unlikely to me that it should be
> memory corruption.  The machine has been running with the same (ecc) memory for
> more than a year and neither the service processor nor the kernel (according to
> dmesg) has caught anything before this. It would be a rare (though I admit not
> impossible) coincidence if we got catastrophic, undetected memory corruption a
> week after attaching a new raid controller with a new disk array.

Memory corruption can be caused by more than just a bad memory
stick. You've got a brand new driver running your brand new
controller and it may still have bugs - it might be scribbling over
memory it doesn't own because of off-by-one index errors, etc. It's
much more likely that that new hardware or driver code is the cause
of your problem than an undetected ECC memory error or core VM
problem.

FWIW, if it's a repeatable problem, you might want to update the
driver and controller firmware to something more recent and see if
that solves the problem....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-10-12  0:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-11  9:17 2.6.38.8 kernel bug in XFS or megaraid driver with heavy I/O load Anders Ossowicki
2011-10-11 13:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-11 14:13   ` Anders Ossowicki
2011-10-11 16:07     ` Jesper Krogh
2011-10-12  0:35     ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2011-10-12  4:13       ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-10-12 12:29       ` Anders Ossowicki
2011-10-17 12:40   ` jesper
2011-10-24 16:45     ` Michael Monnerie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111012003526.GI3159@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=aradford@gmail.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).