From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751849Ab1JLJs7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Oct 2011 05:48:59 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:39443 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751343Ab1JLJs6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Oct 2011 05:48:58 -0400 Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:47:12 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Yinghai Lu Cc: Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Naga Chumbalkar , Suresh Siddha , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 resend] x86, ioapic: Clean up ioapic idx and apic id usage Message-ID: <20111012094711.GA21090@elte.hu> References: <4E1F0BC9.1040102@kernel.org> <4E29BEEA.4020600@kernel.org> <20110725072831.GB22518@elte.hu> <4E95429E.2060100@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E95429E.2060100@oracle.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.3.1 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Yinghai Lu wrote: > Resending x86/ioapic clean up patches. > > it will make sure ioapic_idx is used instead of ioapic or apic_idx to used as index. > > [PATCH 1/5] x86, ioapic: Passing irq_attr struct pointer with setup_ioapic_irq() > [PATCH 2/5] x86, ioapic: Split setup_ioapic_entry for interrupt remapped version > [PATCH 3/5] x86, ioapic: Print out irte with right ioapic index > [PATCH 4/5] x86, ioapic: Seperate print_IO_APIC() to only print one io apic > [PATCH 5/5] x86, ioapic: Clean up ioapic/apic_id usage > > patch1, 2, 4, 5 are cleanup related > patch3 fixes the one idx printout. Applied to tip:x86/apic, thanks! Another io_apic.c issue that Thomas raised is that we should standardize arch/x86 on SPARSE_IRQ=y and get rid of all SPARSE_IRQ=n complications. Thanks, Ingo