From: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
To: Chen Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
x86@kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
seiji.aguchi@hds.com, vgoyal@redhat.com, mjg@redhat.com,
tony.luck@intel.com, gong.chen@intel.com, satoru.moriya@hds.com,
avi@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86, reboot: Use NMI instead of REBOOT_VECTOR to stop cpus
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 08:51:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111012125132.GI5795@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E94FCFE.4090300@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 10:35:42AM +0800, Chen Gong wrote:
> 于 2011/10/11 23:24, Don Zickus 写道:
> >+
> >+ /* sync above data before sending NMI */
> >+ wmb();
> >+
> >+ apic->send_IPI_allbutself(NMI_VECTOR);
> >+
> >+ /*
> >+ * Don't wait longer than a second if the caller
> >+ * didn't ask us to wait.
> >+ */
> >+ timeout = USEC_PER_SEC;
> >+ while (num_online_cpus()> 1&& (wait || timeout--))
> >+ udelay(1);
>
> In this patch and next patch, how about using the same logic in commit 74d91e3c6
I guess I don't understand why I would do that. That commit doesn't seem
to have a way to break out of the while loop and it does not take into account
the 'wait' variable the virt folks needed. The only thing that could be
usable seems to be the 'touch_nmi_watchdog', but in that case if the other
cpus haven't hit the NMI yet, I would be happy for other NMI sources to
trigger to, to help move things along. :-)
The above code snippet is what is currently there and that seems to work
well, so I didn't want to change to much when moving from the IRQ path to
the NMI path.
Perhaps I am missing something?
Cheers,
Don
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-12 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-11 15:24 [PATCH 0/3] Use NMI to stop cpus Don Zickus
2011-10-11 15:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86, reboot: Use NMI instead of REBOOT_VECTOR " Don Zickus
2011-10-12 2:35 ` Chen Gong
2011-10-12 12:51 ` Don Zickus [this message]
2011-10-13 8:17 ` Chen Gong
2011-10-12 7:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-12 12:54 ` Don Zickus
2011-10-12 16:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-11 15:24 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, NMI: Add NMI IPI selftest Don Zickus
2011-10-12 7:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-11 15:24 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86, NMI: knob to disable using NMI IPIs to stop cpus Don Zickus
2011-10-12 7:28 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111012125132.GI5795@redhat.com \
--to=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=gong.chen@intel.com \
--cc=gong.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mjg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
--cc=satoru.moriya@hds.com \
--cc=seiji.aguchi@hds.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox