From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751455Ab1JLOXg (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Oct 2011 10:23:36 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:53438 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751296Ab1JLOXf (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Oct 2011 10:23:35 -0400 Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 08:17:24 -0600 From: Greg KH To: Markus Rechberger Cc: Alan Stern , USB list , LKML Subject: Re: [Patch] Increase USBFS Bulk Transfer size Message-ID: <20111012141724.GA17414@suse.de> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 02:36:59PM +0200, Markus Rechberger wrote: > We have 2 products which can perform better with increased Bulk transfers I don't believe you :) As stated before, this patch is not acceptable. Please work to figure out the real reason for your device problems here, this is not the correct solution at all. sorry, greg k-h