Re: [Patch] Increase USBFS Bulk Transfer size

Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-10-14T05:48:08Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 424 bytes --]

On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 05:42:44 +0200, Markus Rechberger said:

> The inflexible device which uses 24064 bytes works with all other
> Operating systems by using that value
> and gives exactly the same results with other transfer sizes than that.

-ENOPARSE. If it's inflexible, how did you get results for other transfer
sizes? And if other transfer sizes give exactly the same results, why can't you
just use those instead?

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 227 bytes --]