From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ctalbott@google.com, ni@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] block: pass around REQ_* flags instead of broken down booleans during request alloc/free
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:44:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111019134424.GC1140@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1318998384-22525-5-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 09:26:18PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> blk_alloc_request() and freed_request() take different combinations of
> REQ_* @flags, @priv and @is_sync when @flags is superset of the latter
> two. Make them take @flags only. This cleans up the code a bit and
> will ease updating allocation related REQ_* flags.
>
> This patch doesn't introduce any functional difference.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> ---
> block/blk-core.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> index a995141..fafa669 100644
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ static inline void blk_free_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
> }
>
> static struct request *
> -blk_alloc_request(struct request_queue *q, int flags, int priv, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> +blk_alloc_request(struct request_queue *q, unsigned int flags, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> {
> struct request *rq = mempool_alloc(q->rq.rq_pool, gfp_mask);
>
> @@ -586,12 +586,10 @@ blk_alloc_request(struct request_queue *q, int flags, int priv, gfp_t gfp_mask)
>
> rq->cmd_flags = flags | REQ_ALLOCED;
>
> - if (priv) {
> - if (unlikely(elv_set_request(q, rq, gfp_mask))) {
> - mempool_free(rq, q->rq.rq_pool);
> - return NULL;
> - }
> - rq->cmd_flags |= REQ_ELVPRIV;
Don't we need to set REQ_ELVPRIV in rq->cmd_flags in this new code?
> + if ((flags & REQ_ELVPRIV) &&
> + unlikely(elv_set_request(q, rq, gfp_mask))) {
> + mempool_free(rq, q->rq.rq_pool);
> + return NULL;
> }
Thanks
Vivek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-19 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-19 4:26 [PATCHSET block/for-next] fix request_queue life-cycle management Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 4:26 ` [PATCH 01/10] block: make gendisk hold a reference to its queue Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 4:26 ` [PATCH 02/10] block: fix genhd refcounting in blkio_policy_parse_and_set() Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 13:26 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 16:29 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 16:59 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 22:05 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 22:07 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 23:51 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-20 13:41 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-20 16:11 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-20 16:16 ` Kay Sievers
2011-10-20 17:50 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-20 17:47 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 4:26 ` [PATCH 03/10] block: move blk_throtl prototypes to block/blk.h Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 13:33 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 4:26 ` [PATCH 04/10] block: pass around REQ_* flags instead of broken down booleans during request alloc/free Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 13:44 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2011-10-19 16:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 4:26 ` [PATCH 05/10] block: drop unnecessary blk_get/put_queue() in scsi_cmd_ioctl() and blk_get_tg() Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 13:52 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 16:35 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 4:26 ` [PATCH 06/10] block: reorganize queue draining Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 4:26 ` [PATCH 07/10] block: reorganize throtl_get_tg() and blk_throtl_bio() Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 14:56 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 17:06 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 17:19 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 17:30 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 17:45 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 17:49 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 4:26 ` [PATCH 08/10] block: make get_request[_wait]() fail if queue is dead Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 15:22 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 4:26 ` [PATCH 09/10] block: drop @tsk from attempt_plug_merge() and explain sync rules Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 4:26 ` [PATCH 10/10] block: fix request_queue lifetime handling by making blk_queue_cleanup() proper shutdown Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 12:43 ` Jens Axboe
2011-10-19 17:13 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 18:04 ` Jens Axboe
2011-10-19 16:18 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 17:12 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 17:29 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 17:33 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 4:29 ` [PATCHSET block/for-next] fix request_queue life-cycle management Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 12:44 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111019134424.GC1140@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=ctalbott@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ni@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).