linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ctalbott@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] block: reorganize throtl_get_tg() and blk_throtl_bio()
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:56:22 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111019145622.GE1140@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1318998384-22525-8-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>

On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 09:26:21PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> blk_throtl_bio() and throtl_get_tg() have rather unusual interface.
> 
> * throtl_get_tg() returns pointer to a valid tg or ERR_PTR(-ENODEV),
>   and drops queue_lock in the latter case.  Different locking context
>   depending on return value is error-prone and DEAD state is scheduled
>   to be protected by queue_lock anyway.  Move DEAD check inside
>   queue_lock and return valid tg or NULL.

Tejun,

A driver could call blk_cleanup_queue(), mark the queue DEAD and then
free the driver provided spin lock. So once queue is DEAD one could
not rely on queue lock still being there. That's the reason I did
not try to take queue lock again if queue is marked DEAD.

Now I see the change that blk_cleanup_queue will start poiting to
internal queue lock (Thought it is racy). This will atleast make
sure that some spinlock is around. So now this change should be
fine.

> 
> * blk_throtl_bio() indicates return status both with its return value
>   and in/out param **@bio.  The former is used to indicate whether
>   queue is found to be dead during throtl processing.  The latter
>   whether the bio is throttled.
> 
>   There's no point in returning DEAD check result from
>   blk_throtl_bio().  The queue can die after blk_throtl_bio() is
>   finished but before make_request_fn() grabs queue lock.

The reason I was returning error in case of queue DEAD is that I wanted
IO to now return with error instead of continuing to call q->make_request_fn(q, bio) which does not do queue dead check and assumes queue is still alive.

With this change, if queue is DEAD, bio will not be throttled and we
will continue to submit bio to queue and I am not sure who will catch
it in __make_request()?

Thanks
Vivek

  reply	other threads:[~2011-10-19 14:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-19  4:26 [PATCHSET block/for-next] fix request_queue life-cycle management Tejun Heo
2011-10-19  4:26 ` [PATCH 01/10] block: make gendisk hold a reference to its queue Tejun Heo
2011-10-19  4:26 ` [PATCH 02/10] block: fix genhd refcounting in blkio_policy_parse_and_set() Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 13:26   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 16:29     ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 16:59       ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 22:05         ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 22:07           ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 23:51             ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-20 13:41               ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-20 16:11                 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-20 16:16                   ` Kay Sievers
2011-10-20 17:50                     ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-20 17:47                   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19  4:26 ` [PATCH 03/10] block: move blk_throtl prototypes to block/blk.h Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 13:33   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19  4:26 ` [PATCH 04/10] block: pass around REQ_* flags instead of broken down booleans during request alloc/free Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 13:44   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 16:31     ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19  4:26 ` [PATCH 05/10] block: drop unnecessary blk_get/put_queue() in scsi_cmd_ioctl() and blk_get_tg() Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 13:52   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 16:35     ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19  4:26 ` [PATCH 06/10] block: reorganize queue draining Tejun Heo
2011-10-19  4:26 ` [PATCH 07/10] block: reorganize throtl_get_tg() and blk_throtl_bio() Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 14:56   ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2011-10-19 17:06     ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 17:19       ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 17:30         ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 17:45           ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 17:49             ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19  4:26 ` [PATCH 08/10] block: make get_request[_wait]() fail if queue is dead Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 15:22   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19  4:26 ` [PATCH 09/10] block: drop @tsk from attempt_plug_merge() and explain sync rules Tejun Heo
2011-10-19  4:26 ` [PATCH 10/10] block: fix request_queue lifetime handling by making blk_queue_cleanup() proper shutdown Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 12:43   ` Jens Axboe
2011-10-19 17:13     ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 18:04       ` Jens Axboe
2011-10-19 16:18   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 17:12     ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 17:29       ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 17:33         ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19  4:29 ` [PATCHSET block/for-next] fix request_queue life-cycle management Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 12:44 ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111019145622.GE1140@redhat.com \
    --to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=ctalbott@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).