From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754438Ab1JULM1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:12:27 -0400 Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:39224 "EHLO opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754310Ab1JULM0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:12:26 -0400 Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 12:12:23 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Ashish Chavan Cc: "Girdwood, Liam" , alsa-devel , David Dajun Chen , "kuninori.morimoto.gx" , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v7 2/3] ASoC: da7210: Add support for line out and DAC Message-ID: <20111021111223.GD4080@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1319121769.24621.130.camel@matrix> <1319186260.24621.154.camel@matrix> <20111021090054.GF3513@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <1319190555.24621.160.camel@matrix> <20111021102429.GB4080@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <1319195132.24621.198.camel@matrix> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1319195132.24621.198.camel@matrix> X-Cookie: You will soon forget this. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 04:35:32PM +0530, Ashish Chavan wrote: > Yes, your understanding is correct. Actually I acted bit lazy here by > not splitting, assuming that both patches are going to get merged > shortly. Do you think is it mandatory to do that? Or can I repost the > patch after just resolving merge issue? It's better to refactor, it makes review much easier.