From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Simon Kirby <sim@hostway.ca>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: XFS read hangs in 3.1-rc10
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:22:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111021132240.GA24136@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111020224214.GC22772@hostway.ca>
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 03:42:14PM -0700, Simon Kirby wrote:
>
> [<ffffffff8126f205>] xfs_reclaim_inode+0x85/0x2b0
> [<ffffffff8126f5b0>] xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag+0x180/0x2f0
> [<ffffffff8126f74e>] xfs_reclaim_inodes_nr+0x2e/0x40
> [<ffffffff8126ccf0>] xfs_fs_free_cached_objects+0x10/0x20
> [<ffffffff81119a70>] prune_super+0x110/0x1b0
> [<ffffffff810e4fa5>] shrink_slab+0x1e5/0x2a0
> [<ffffffff810e5821>] kswapd+0x7c1/0xba0
> [<ffffffff8107ada6>] kthread+0x96/0xb0
> [<ffffffff816c0474>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
> [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
We're stuck in synchronous inode reclaim.
> All of the other processes that get stuck have this stack:
>
> [<ffffffff81080587>] down+0x47/0x50
> [<ffffffff8125e816>] xfs_buf_lock+0x66/0xd0
> [<ffffffff812603ad>] _xfs_buf_find+0x16d/0x270
> [<ffffffff81260517>] xfs_buf_get+0x67/0x1a0
> [<ffffffff8126067a>] xfs_buf_read+0x2a/0x120
> [<ffffffff812b876f>] xfs_trans_read_buf+0x28f/0x3f0
> [<ffffffff8129e161>] xfs_read_agi+0x71/0x100
They are waiting for the AGI buffer to become unlocked. The only reason
it is held locked for longer time is when it is under I/O.
>
> By the way, xfs_reclaim_inode+0x85 (133) disassembles as:
>
> ...So the next function is wait_for_completion(), which is marked
> __sched and thus doesn't show up in the trace.
So we're waiting for the inode to be flushed, aka I/O again.
What is interesting here is that we're always blocking on the AGI
buffer - which is used during unlinks of inodes, and thus gets hit
fairly heavily for a workload that does a lot of unlinks.
> When the clog happens, "iostat -x -k 1" shows no reads from the XFS
> devices, though writes keep happening. "vmstat 1" matches. I tried
> switching schedulers from CFQ to deadline -- no difference. Queue depth
> is empty on the devices and nothing is actually clogged up at the device
> -- it's not actually plugged at the controller or disk. I did a sysreq-w
> while this was happening. About 10 seconds later, everything unclogs and
> continues. Sysreq-W output below. I poked around at the various XFS
> tracepoints in /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/xfs, but I'm not sure
> which tracepoints to use and many of them scroll too fast to see
> anything. Any suggestions?
Given that you are doing a lot of unlinks I wonder if it is related
to the recent ail pushing issues in that area. While your symptoms
looks completely different we could be blocking on the flush completion
for an inode that gets stuck in the AIL.
Can you run with latest 3.0-stable plus the patches at:
http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/2011-October/053464.html
If this doesn't help I'll probably need to come up with some tracing
patches for you.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-21 13:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-20 22:42 XFS read hangs in 3.1-rc10 Simon Kirby
2011-10-21 13:22 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2011-10-21 20:28 ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-24 8:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-25 20:07 ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-26 11:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-04 21:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-16 19:56 ` Simon Kirby
2011-11-20 15:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-28 19:05 ` Simon Kirby
2011-11-28 19:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-28 21:01 ` Ben Myers
2011-10-21 20:29 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111021132240.GA24136@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sim@hostway.ca \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).