public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Mailing List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI / ACPI: Make acpiphp ignore root bridges using PCIe native hotplug
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 00:10:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201110230010.37802.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE9FiQUxuajrqka97M_tvbXoMSzPTBGyjiBib_EG4MjRTuNmFQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Saturday, October 22, 2011, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> >
> > If the kernel has requested control of the PCIe native hotplug
> > feature for a given root complex, the acpiphp driver should not try
> > to handle that root complex and it should leave it to pciehp.
> > Failing to do so causes problems to happen if acpiphp is loaded
> > before pciehp on such systems.
> 
> Should pciehp be built-in kernel instead of as a module?

Well, perhaps.  Still, though, if someone doesn't build pciehp and
the control of the native PCIe hotplug is granted for a given root
complex, acpiphp won't work anyway.

Thanks,
Rafael

  reply	other threads:[~2011-10-22 22:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-21 22:43 [PATCH] PCI / ACPI: Make acpiphp ignore root bridges using PCIe native hotplug Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-10-22 21:58 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-10-22 22:10   ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2011-10-25 13:10 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2011-10-25 13:25   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-10-26  0:28     ` Kenji Kaneshige
2011-10-26 11:42       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-10-28  2:45         ` Kenji Kaneshige
2011-11-06 22:11           ` [PATCH] PCI / ACPI: Make acpiphp ignore root bridges using SHPC " Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-11-07  1:43             ` Kenji Kaneshige
2011-11-11 17:49               ` Jesse Barnes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201110230010.37802.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox