From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752363Ab1JWWXH (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Oct 2011 18:23:07 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:40032 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752164Ab1JWWXF (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Oct 2011 18:23:05 -0400 Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 00:19:20 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Raghavendra K T Cc: KVM , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Sedat Dilek , Virtualization , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Dave Jiang , Thomas Gleixner , Stefano Stabellini , Gleb Natapov , Yinghai Lu , Marcelo Tosatti , Ingo Molnar , Avi Kivity , Rik van Riel , Xen , LKML , Suzuki Poulose , Srivatsa Vaddagiri , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V2 2/5] debugfs: Renaming of xen functions and change unsigned to u32 Message-ID: <20111023221920.GA591@suse.de> References: <20111023190307.16364.35381.sendpatchset@oc5400248562.ibm.com> <20111023190459.16364.98151.sendpatchset@oc5400248562.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111023190459.16364.98151.sendpatchset@oc5400248562.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 12:34:59AM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote: > Renaming of xen functions and change unsigned to u32. Why not just rename when you move the functions? Why the extra step? greg k-h