From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Daniel J Blueman <daniel@numascale-asia.com>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
Steffen Persvold <sp@numascale.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Add multi-node boot support
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:30:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111027073029.GD15923@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1319609230-18897-2-git-send-email-daniel@numascale-asia.com>
* Daniel J Blueman <daniel@numascale-asia.com> wrote:
> From: Steffen Persvold <sp@numascale.com>
>
> From: Steffen Persvold <sp@numascale.com>
>
> Fix booting multi-node systems with Numascale's NumaChip.
>
> v2:
> - [Daniel] rediffed and validated against 3.1-rc10
>
> Signed-off-by: Steffen Persvold <sp@numascale.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel J Blueman <daniel@numascale-asia.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
> index b13ed39..4b551f5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> #include <asm/apic.h>
> #include <asm/cpu.h>
> #include <asm/pci-direct.h>
> +#include <asm/numachip/numachip.h>
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> # include <asm/numa_64.h>
> @@ -350,6 +351,12 @@ static void __cpuinit srat_detect_node(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> node = numa_cpu_node(cpu);
> if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
> node = per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu);
> + else if (is_numachip_system()) {
> + /* fix for multi-node systems: set phys_proc_id and cpu_llc_id
> + to node number from ACPI SRAT table */
please use the customary (multi-line) comment style:
/*
* Comment .....
* ...... goes here.
*/
specified in Documentation/CodingStyle.
> + c->phys_proc_id = node;
> + per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu) = node;
> + }
But more importantly, please first explain why the quirk is needed
(the patch only explains what it does but does not explain why it
needs these changes - other NUMA systems are able to boot without
this quirk).
If it's absolutely needed then add a proper quirk handler instead of
polluting the generic code.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-27 7:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-26 6:07 [PATCH 1/3] Add Numachip APIC support Daniel J Blueman
2011-10-26 6:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] Add multi-node boot support Daniel J Blueman
2011-10-27 7:30 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2011-10-27 10:46 ` Steffen Persvold
2011-10-27 11:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-27 11:42 ` Steffen Persvold
2011-12-02 18:31 ` Daniel J Blueman
2011-12-05 8:20 ` [PATCH 1/3] Make flat_init_apic_ldr available Daniel J Blueman
2011-12-05 8:20 ` [PATCH 2/3] v2: Add x86_init platform override to fix up core numbering Daniel J Blueman
2011-12-05 17:58 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86: Add x86_init platform override to fix up NUMA " tip-bot for Daniel J Blueman
2011-12-06 6:30 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86: Fix the !CONFIG_NUMA build of the new CPU ID fixup code support tip-bot for Steffen Persvold
2011-12-05 8:20 ` [PATCH 3/3] v4: Add support for Numascale's NumaChip Daniel J Blueman
2011-12-05 9:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-05 9:49 ` Steffen Persvold
2011-12-05 16:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] v5: Add NumaChip support Daniel J Blueman
2011-12-05 17:59 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86: " tip-bot for Steffen Persvold
2011-12-05 20:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-06 0:10 ` Steffen Persvold
2011-12-06 5:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-06 6:09 ` Steffen Persvold
2011-12-08 22:35 ` Kevin Winchester
2011-12-09 1:24 ` Steffen Persvold
2011-12-09 7:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-10 1:52 ` Kevin Winchester
2011-12-10 2:28 ` Kevin Winchester
2011-12-18 9:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-19 0:12 ` [PATCH] x86: Simplify code by allowing more of struct cpuinfo_x86 for the !SMP case Kevin Winchester
2011-12-19 14:07 ` [tip:x86/apic] " tip-bot for Kevin Winchester
2011-12-19 18:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-21 0:52 ` [PATCH] " Kevin Winchester
2011-12-21 8:48 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86: Simplify code by removing a !SMP #ifdefs from 'struct cpuinfo_x86' tip-bot for Kevin Winchester
2011-12-05 17:57 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86: Make flat_init_apic_ldr() available tip-bot for Daniel J Blueman
2011-10-26 6:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] Add NumaChip quirk Daniel J Blueman
2011-10-27 7:26 ` [PATCH 1/3] Add Numachip APIC support Ingo Molnar
2011-10-27 7:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-27 7:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-27 10:31 ` Steffen Persvold
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-10-18 8:22 Daniel J Blueman
2011-10-18 8:22 ` [PATCH 2/3] Add multi-node boot support Daniel J Blueman
2011-07-22 10:44 [PATCH 1/3] Add Numachip APIC support Daniel J Blueman
2011-07-22 10:44 ` [PATCH 2/3] Add multi-node boot support Daniel J Blueman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111027073029.GD15923@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=daniel@numascale-asia.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=sp@numascale.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).