From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, ctalbott@google.com, rni@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH UPDATED 10/13] block, cfq: unlink cfq_io_context's immediately
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 13:05:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111027170524.GH7491@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111027161701.GB29899@google.com>
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 09:17:01AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:31:19AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 02:31:07PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > BUG_ON(atomic_long_read(&ioc->refcount) <= 0);
> > > + if (locked_q)
> > > + lockdep_assert_held(locked_q->queue_lock);
> > >
> >
> > Looks like lockdep_assert_held() can't be used if !CONFIG_LOCKDEP. So
> > Jens had put following patch to fix one compilation issue. You might
> > want to provide a null definition of lockdep_assert_held() in case
> > of !CONFIG_LOCKDEP.
> >
> > commit 334c2b0b8b2ab186fa198413386cba41fffcb4f2
> > Author: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> > Date: Tue Oct 25 15:51:48 2011 +0200
> >
> > blk-throttle: use queue_is_locked() instead of lockdep_is_held()
> >
> > We can't use the latter if !CONFIG_LOCKDEP.
> >
> > Reported-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@googlemail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
>
> Eh? lockdep.h has dummy definition if !CONFIG_LOCKDEP.
I can't seem to find the dummy definition in include/linux/lockdep.h for
!CONFIG_LOCKDEP.
I see only following under CONFIG_LOCKDEP.
#define lockdep_is_held(lock) lock_is_held(&(lock)->dep_map)
and nothing under #else clause.
Thanks
Vivek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-27 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-26 1:48 [PATCHSET block:for-3.2/core] rescue cfq from RCU death sprial :) Tejun Heo
2011-10-26 1:48 ` [PATCH 01/13] ida: make ida_simple_get/put() IRQ safe Tejun Heo
2011-10-26 4:42 ` Rusty Russell
2011-10-26 20:28 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-26 1:48 ` [PATCH 02/13] block, cfq: move cfqd->cic_index to q->id Tejun Heo
2011-10-26 1:48 ` [PATCH 03/13] block: misc ioc cleanups Tejun Heo
2011-10-26 1:48 ` [PATCH 04/13] block: make ioc get/put interface more conventional and fix race on alloction Tejun Heo
2011-10-26 16:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-26 19:29 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-26 21:30 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-10-26 1:48 ` [PATCH 05/13] block: misc updates to blk_get_queue() Tejun Heo
2011-10-26 1:48 ` [PATCH 06/13] block, cfq: misc updates to cfq_io_context Tejun Heo
2011-10-27 15:39 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-27 16:24 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-26 1:48 ` [PATCH 07/13] block, cfq: move ioc ioprio/cgroup changed handling to cic Tejun Heo
2011-10-26 1:48 ` [PATCH 08/13] block, cfq: fix race condition in cic creation path and tighten locking Tejun Heo
2011-10-26 1:48 ` [PATCH 09/13] block, cfq: fix cic lookup locking Tejun Heo
2011-10-26 1:48 ` [PATCH 10/13] block, cfq: unlink cfq_io_context's immediately Tejun Heo
2011-10-26 19:48 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-26 19:55 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-26 20:38 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-26 20:54 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-26 21:31 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-10-27 14:31 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-27 16:17 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-27 17:05 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2011-10-27 17:11 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-26 1:48 ` [PATCH 11/13] block, cfq: remove delayed unlink Tejun Heo
2011-10-26 1:48 ` [PATCH 12/13] block, cfq: kill ioc_gone Tejun Heo
2011-10-26 1:48 ` [PATCH 13/13] block, cfq: kill cic->key Tejun Heo
2011-10-26 21:36 ` [PATCHSET block:for-3.2/core] rescue cfq from RCU death sprial :) Tejun Heo
2011-10-27 15:32 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-27 16:10 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111027170524.GH7491@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=ctalbott@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rni@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).