* Re: [PATCH 00/17] drop unused Kconfig symbols
[not found] <1319456255.2409.30.camel@x61.thuisdomein>
@ 2011-10-31 22:42 ` Michal Marek
2011-10-31 22:55 ` Paul Bolle
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Michal Marek @ 2011-10-31 22:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Bolle; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 01:37:35PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> 0) This is what's left of the Kconfig patches that I send (to
> maintainers and lkml) ten days ago.
>
> 1) I've dropped five patches that were taken by the maintainers
> (blackfin, unicore32, tomoyo, m68k, and staging). cris got a NAK (for an
> invalid reason, but I guess I'll just try again after the v3.2 merge
> window closes).
>
> 2) I've added all the tags the rest of these patches collected.
>
> 3) No further tests were done since I first send these (not that the
> tests done then were very thorough).
>
> 4) I'll send these patches only to you and the people that added a tag.
> Please tell me if you'd like me to also cc lkml and the maintainers. I
> assumed cc'ing those addresses would not be helpful in this stage.
>
> Paul Bolle (17):
> alpha: drop unused Kconfig symbol
> sparc: drop unused Kconfig symbol
> um: drop unused Kconfig symbol
> sh: drop unused Kconfig symbol
> score: drop unused Kconfig symbols
> m32r: drop unused Kconfig symbol
> samples: drop unused Kconfig symbol
> arm: at91: drop unused Kconfig symbol
> (arm: drop unused Kconfig symbol -- skipped)
> openrisc: drop unused Kconfig symbols
> mips: drop unused Kconfig symbols
> powerpc: 40x: drop unused Kconfig symbol
> powerpc: drop unused Kconfig symbols
> x86: drop unused Kconfig symbol
> stmmac: drop unused Kconfig symbol
> pci: drop unused Kconfig symbol
> scsi: drop unused Kconfig symbol
Applied except for the one arm commit.
Michal
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/17] drop unused Kconfig symbols
2011-10-31 22:42 ` [PATCH 00/17] drop unused Kconfig symbols Michal Marek
@ 2011-10-31 22:55 ` Paul Bolle
2011-11-01 8:59 ` Jesper Nilsson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paul Bolle @ 2011-10-31 22:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Marek
Cc: linux-kernel, Jesper Nilsson, Mikael Starvik,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Paul Mundt
On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 23:42 +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 01:37:35PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > 1) I've dropped five patches that were taken by the maintainers
> > (blackfin, unicore32, tomoyo, m68k, and staging). cris got a NAK (for an
> > invalid reason, but I guess I'll just try again after the v3.2 merge
> > window closes).
Just today Jesper Nilsson basically dropped that NAK. I assume Jesper
will try to carry the patch in (one of) their tree(s). Is that correct?
> > 4) I'll send these patches only to you and the people that added a tag.
> > Please tell me if you'd like me to also cc lkml and the maintainers. I
> > assumed cc'ing those addresses would not be helpful in this stage.
> >
> > Paul Bolle (17):
> > alpha: drop unused Kconfig symbol
> > sparc: drop unused Kconfig symbol
> > um: drop unused Kconfig symbol
> > sh: drop unused Kconfig symbol
Paul Mundt applied this one a few days ago. But I think git merge will
handle that somewhere down the road.
> > score: drop unused Kconfig symbols
> > m32r: drop unused Kconfig symbol
> > samples: drop unused Kconfig symbol
> > arm: at91: drop unused Kconfig symbol
> > (arm: drop unused Kconfig symbol -- skipped)
> > openrisc: drop unused Kconfig symbols
> > mips: drop unused Kconfig symbols
> > powerpc: 40x: drop unused Kconfig symbol
> > powerpc: drop unused Kconfig symbols
> > x86: drop unused Kconfig symbol
> > stmmac: drop unused Kconfig symbol
> > pci: drop unused Kconfig symbol
> > scsi: drop unused Kconfig symbol
>
> Applied except for the one arm commit.
Paul Bolle
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/17] drop unused Kconfig symbols
2011-10-31 22:55 ` Paul Bolle
@ 2011-11-01 8:59 ` Jesper Nilsson
2011-11-01 9:46 ` Paul Bolle
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jesper Nilsson @ 2011-11-01 8:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Bolle
Cc: Michal Marek, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mikael Starvik,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Paul Mundt
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:55:16PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 23:42 +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 01:37:35PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > > 1) I've dropped five patches that were taken by the maintainers
> > > (blackfin, unicore32, tomoyo, m68k, and staging). cris got a NAK (for an
> > > invalid reason, but I guess I'll just try again after the v3.2 merge
> > > window closes).
>
> Just today Jesper Nilsson basically dropped that NAK. I assume Jesper
> will try to carry the patch in (one of) their tree(s). Is that correct?
The patch that reintroduces the Kconfigs, yes, the one that removes them, no.
> Paul Bolle
/^JN - Jesper Nilsson
--
Jesper Nilsson -- jesper.nilsson@axis.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/17] drop unused Kconfig symbols
2011-11-01 8:59 ` Jesper Nilsson
@ 2011-11-01 9:46 ` Paul Bolle
2011-11-01 10:12 ` Jesper Nilsson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paul Bolle @ 2011-11-01 9:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jesper Nilsson
Cc: Michal Marek, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mikael Starvik,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 09:59 +0100, Jesper Nilsson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:55:16PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > Just today Jesper Nilsson basically dropped that NAK. I assume Jesper
> > will try to carry the patch in (one of) their tree(s). Is that correct?
>
> The patch that reintroduces the Kconfigs, yes, the one that removes them, no.
But yesterday you wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 09:11:01PM +0200, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
[...]
> > (Personally, I'm tending towards unless it's going to be in linux-next within
> > the next month or so, pull the Kconfig variables out and the driver can re-add
> > them when it actually lands)
>
> Ok, let's do it the right way and remove them now, and I can re-add
> them in the same tree.
So your plans have changed? It's OK with me if they change, of course,
but now I'm unsure what you intend to do.
Paul Bolle
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/17] drop unused Kconfig symbols
2011-11-01 9:46 ` Paul Bolle
@ 2011-11-01 10:12 ` Jesper Nilsson
2011-11-01 10:35 ` Paul Bolle
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jesper Nilsson @ 2011-11-01 10:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Bolle
Cc: Michal Marek, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mikael Starvik,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 10:46:04AM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 09:59 +0100, Jesper Nilsson wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:55:16PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > > Just today Jesper Nilsson basically dropped that NAK. I assume Jesper
> > > will try to carry the patch in (one of) their tree(s). Is that correct?
> >
> > The patch that reintroduces the Kconfigs, yes, the one that removes them, no.
>
> But yesterday you wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 09:11:01PM +0200, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> [...]
> > > (Personally, I'm tending towards unless it's going to be in linux-next within
> > > the next month or so, pull the Kconfig variables out and the driver can re-add
> > > them when it actually lands)
> >
> > Ok, let's do it the right way and remove them now, and I can re-add
> > them in the same tree.
>
> So your plans have changed? It's OK with me if they change, of course,
> but now I'm unsure what you intend to do.
Sorry, I was unclear and not complete in my sentence above.
I was referring above to the tree that the drivers will be added in,
not the one where the Kconfigs will be removed.
I assumed that the removal patch was handled elsewhere, so I didn't
pick up the original patch which removed them.
So, just to be clear on what I intend to do (now that I know what you meant):
- Pick up the removal patch to the CRIS-tree.
- Create a new tree/branch with the missing drivers and the Kconfigs readded.
Does this seem allright for you?
> Paul Bolle
/^JN - Jesper Nilsson
--
Jesper Nilsson -- jesper.nilsson@axis.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/17] drop unused Kconfig symbols
2011-11-01 10:12 ` Jesper Nilsson
@ 2011-11-01 10:35 ` Paul Bolle
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paul Bolle @ 2011-11-01 10:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jesper Nilsson
Cc: Michal Marek, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mikael Starvik,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 11:12 +0100, Jesper Nilsson wrote:
> So, just to be clear on what I intend to do (now that I know what you meant):
>
> - Pick up the removal patch to the CRIS-tree.
> - Create a new tree/branch with the missing drivers and the Kconfigs readded.
>
> Does this seem allright for you?
I can't really complain if you decide to carry a patch I submitted, can
I? So, yes, this is OK with me.
Thanks for clearing this up.
Paul Bolle
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-11-01 10:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1319456255.2409.30.camel@x61.thuisdomein>
2011-10-31 22:42 ` [PATCH 00/17] drop unused Kconfig symbols Michal Marek
2011-10-31 22:55 ` Paul Bolle
2011-11-01 8:59 ` Jesper Nilsson
2011-11-01 9:46 ` Paul Bolle
2011-11-01 10:12 ` Jesper Nilsson
2011-11-01 10:35 ` Paul Bolle
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox