* Re: [PATCH 00/17] drop unused Kconfig symbols [not found] <1319456255.2409.30.camel@x61.thuisdomein> @ 2011-10-31 22:42 ` Michal Marek 2011-10-31 22:55 ` Paul Bolle 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Michal Marek @ 2011-10-31 22:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Bolle; +Cc: linux-kernel On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 01:37:35PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > 0) This is what's left of the Kconfig patches that I send (to > maintainers and lkml) ten days ago. > > 1) I've dropped five patches that were taken by the maintainers > (blackfin, unicore32, tomoyo, m68k, and staging). cris got a NAK (for an > invalid reason, but I guess I'll just try again after the v3.2 merge > window closes). > > 2) I've added all the tags the rest of these patches collected. > > 3) No further tests were done since I first send these (not that the > tests done then were very thorough). > > 4) I'll send these patches only to you and the people that added a tag. > Please tell me if you'd like me to also cc lkml and the maintainers. I > assumed cc'ing those addresses would not be helpful in this stage. > > Paul Bolle (17): > alpha: drop unused Kconfig symbol > sparc: drop unused Kconfig symbol > um: drop unused Kconfig symbol > sh: drop unused Kconfig symbol > score: drop unused Kconfig symbols > m32r: drop unused Kconfig symbol > samples: drop unused Kconfig symbol > arm: at91: drop unused Kconfig symbol > (arm: drop unused Kconfig symbol -- skipped) > openrisc: drop unused Kconfig symbols > mips: drop unused Kconfig symbols > powerpc: 40x: drop unused Kconfig symbol > powerpc: drop unused Kconfig symbols > x86: drop unused Kconfig symbol > stmmac: drop unused Kconfig symbol > pci: drop unused Kconfig symbol > scsi: drop unused Kconfig symbol Applied except for the one arm commit. Michal ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/17] drop unused Kconfig symbols 2011-10-31 22:42 ` [PATCH 00/17] drop unused Kconfig symbols Michal Marek @ 2011-10-31 22:55 ` Paul Bolle 2011-11-01 8:59 ` Jesper Nilsson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Paul Bolle @ 2011-10-31 22:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Michal Marek Cc: linux-kernel, Jesper Nilsson, Mikael Starvik, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Paul Mundt On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 23:42 +0100, Michal Marek wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 01:37:35PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > > 1) I've dropped five patches that were taken by the maintainers > > (blackfin, unicore32, tomoyo, m68k, and staging). cris got a NAK (for an > > invalid reason, but I guess I'll just try again after the v3.2 merge > > window closes). Just today Jesper Nilsson basically dropped that NAK. I assume Jesper will try to carry the patch in (one of) their tree(s). Is that correct? > > 4) I'll send these patches only to you and the people that added a tag. > > Please tell me if you'd like me to also cc lkml and the maintainers. I > > assumed cc'ing those addresses would not be helpful in this stage. > > > > Paul Bolle (17): > > alpha: drop unused Kconfig symbol > > sparc: drop unused Kconfig symbol > > um: drop unused Kconfig symbol > > sh: drop unused Kconfig symbol Paul Mundt applied this one a few days ago. But I think git merge will handle that somewhere down the road. > > score: drop unused Kconfig symbols > > m32r: drop unused Kconfig symbol > > samples: drop unused Kconfig symbol > > arm: at91: drop unused Kconfig symbol > > (arm: drop unused Kconfig symbol -- skipped) > > openrisc: drop unused Kconfig symbols > > mips: drop unused Kconfig symbols > > powerpc: 40x: drop unused Kconfig symbol > > powerpc: drop unused Kconfig symbols > > x86: drop unused Kconfig symbol > > stmmac: drop unused Kconfig symbol > > pci: drop unused Kconfig symbol > > scsi: drop unused Kconfig symbol > > Applied except for the one arm commit. Paul Bolle ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/17] drop unused Kconfig symbols 2011-10-31 22:55 ` Paul Bolle @ 2011-11-01 8:59 ` Jesper Nilsson 2011-11-01 9:46 ` Paul Bolle 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Jesper Nilsson @ 2011-11-01 8:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Bolle Cc: Michal Marek, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mikael Starvik, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Paul Mundt On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:55:16PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 23:42 +0100, Michal Marek wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 01:37:35PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > > > 1) I've dropped five patches that were taken by the maintainers > > > (blackfin, unicore32, tomoyo, m68k, and staging). cris got a NAK (for an > > > invalid reason, but I guess I'll just try again after the v3.2 merge > > > window closes). > > Just today Jesper Nilsson basically dropped that NAK. I assume Jesper > will try to carry the patch in (one of) their tree(s). Is that correct? The patch that reintroduces the Kconfigs, yes, the one that removes them, no. > Paul Bolle /^JN - Jesper Nilsson -- Jesper Nilsson -- jesper.nilsson@axis.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/17] drop unused Kconfig symbols 2011-11-01 8:59 ` Jesper Nilsson @ 2011-11-01 9:46 ` Paul Bolle 2011-11-01 10:12 ` Jesper Nilsson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Paul Bolle @ 2011-11-01 9:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jesper Nilsson Cc: Michal Marek, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mikael Starvik, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 09:59 +0100, Jesper Nilsson wrote: > On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:55:16PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: > > Just today Jesper Nilsson basically dropped that NAK. I assume Jesper > > will try to carry the patch in (one of) their tree(s). Is that correct? > > The patch that reintroduces the Kconfigs, yes, the one that removes them, no. But yesterday you wrote: On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 09:11:01PM +0200, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: [...] > > (Personally, I'm tending towards unless it's going to be in linux-next within > > the next month or so, pull the Kconfig variables out and the driver can re-add > > them when it actually lands) > > Ok, let's do it the right way and remove them now, and I can re-add > them in the same tree. So your plans have changed? It's OK with me if they change, of course, but now I'm unsure what you intend to do. Paul Bolle ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/17] drop unused Kconfig symbols 2011-11-01 9:46 ` Paul Bolle @ 2011-11-01 10:12 ` Jesper Nilsson 2011-11-01 10:35 ` Paul Bolle 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Jesper Nilsson @ 2011-11-01 10:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Bolle Cc: Michal Marek, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mikael Starvik, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 10:46:04AM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 09:59 +0100, Jesper Nilsson wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:55:16PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: > > > Just today Jesper Nilsson basically dropped that NAK. I assume Jesper > > > will try to carry the patch in (one of) their tree(s). Is that correct? > > > > The patch that reintroduces the Kconfigs, yes, the one that removes them, no. > > But yesterday you wrote: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 09:11:01PM +0200, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > [...] > > > (Personally, I'm tending towards unless it's going to be in linux-next within > > > the next month or so, pull the Kconfig variables out and the driver can re-add > > > them when it actually lands) > > > > Ok, let's do it the right way and remove them now, and I can re-add > > them in the same tree. > > So your plans have changed? It's OK with me if they change, of course, > but now I'm unsure what you intend to do. Sorry, I was unclear and not complete in my sentence above. I was referring above to the tree that the drivers will be added in, not the one where the Kconfigs will be removed. I assumed that the removal patch was handled elsewhere, so I didn't pick up the original patch which removed them. So, just to be clear on what I intend to do (now that I know what you meant): - Pick up the removal patch to the CRIS-tree. - Create a new tree/branch with the missing drivers and the Kconfigs readded. Does this seem allright for you? > Paul Bolle /^JN - Jesper Nilsson -- Jesper Nilsson -- jesper.nilsson@axis.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/17] drop unused Kconfig symbols 2011-11-01 10:12 ` Jesper Nilsson @ 2011-11-01 10:35 ` Paul Bolle 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Paul Bolle @ 2011-11-01 10:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jesper Nilsson Cc: Michal Marek, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mikael Starvik, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 11:12 +0100, Jesper Nilsson wrote: > So, just to be clear on what I intend to do (now that I know what you meant): > > - Pick up the removal patch to the CRIS-tree. > - Create a new tree/branch with the missing drivers and the Kconfigs readded. > > Does this seem allright for you? I can't really complain if you decide to carry a patch I submitted, can I? So, yes, this is OK with me. Thanks for clearing this up. Paul Bolle ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-11-01 10:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1319456255.2409.30.camel@x61.thuisdomein>
2011-10-31 22:42 ` [PATCH 00/17] drop unused Kconfig symbols Michal Marek
2011-10-31 22:55 ` Paul Bolle
2011-11-01 8:59 ` Jesper Nilsson
2011-11-01 9:46 ` Paul Bolle
2011-11-01 10:12 ` Jesper Nilsson
2011-11-01 10:35 ` Paul Bolle
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox