From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Carsten Emde <cbe@osadl.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next 20111025: warnings in rcu_idle_exit_common()/rcu_idle_enter_common()
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 07:44:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111102144403.GA22445@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111101163212.GA19501@localhost>
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 12:32:12AM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > Hmmmm... Please see below for a diagnostic patch that prints out who
> > the kernel believes the idle thread is. Could you please give this
> > a go?
>
> Sure. Here it goes :)
And here is a possible fix. Could you please test it?
Thanx, Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------------
rcu: Fix idle-task checks
RCU has traditionally relied on idle_cpu() to determine whether a given
CPU is running in the context of an idle task, but recent changes have
invalidated this approach. This commit therefore switches from idle_cpu
to "current->pid != 0".
Suggested-by: Carsten Emde <C.Emde@osadl.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
diff --git a/kernel/rcutiny.c b/kernel/rcutiny.c
index f4e7bc3..35f8a07 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutiny.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutiny.c
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static void rcu_idle_enter_common(long long oldval)
return;
}
RCU_TRACE(trace_rcu_dyntick("Start", oldval, rcu_dynticks_nesting));
- if (!idle_cpu(smp_processor_id())) {
+ if (current->pid != 0) {
struct task_struct *idle = idle_task(smp_processor_id());
RCU_TRACE(trace_rcu_dyntick("Error on entry: not idle task",
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ static void rcu_idle_exit_common(long long oldval)
return;
}
RCU_TRACE(trace_rcu_dyntick("End", oldval, rcu_dynticks_nesting));
- if (!idle_cpu(smp_processor_id())) {
+ if (!current->pid != 0) {
struct task_struct *idle = idle_task(smp_processor_id());
RCU_TRACE(trace_rcu_dyntick("Error on exit: not idle task",
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index 3d7b474..414af68 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ static void rcu_idle_enter_common(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp, long long oldval)
return;
}
trace_rcu_dyntick("Start", oldval, rdtp->dynticks_nesting);
- if (!idle_cpu(smp_processor_id())) {
+ if (current->pid != 0) {
struct task_struct *idle = idle_task(smp_processor_id());
trace_rcu_dyntick("Error on entry: not idle task",
@@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ static void rcu_idle_exit_common(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp, long long oldval)
smp_mb__after_atomic_inc(); /* See above. */
WARN_ON_ONCE(!(atomic_read(&rdtp->dynticks) & 0x1));
trace_rcu_dyntick("End", oldval, rdtp->dynticks_nesting);
- if (!idle_cpu(smp_processor_id())) {
+ if (current->pid != 0) {
struct task_struct *idle = idle_task(smp_processor_id());
trace_rcu_dyntick("Error on exit: not idle task",
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-02 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-31 8:26 linux-next 20111025: warnings in rcu_idle_exit_common()/rcu_idle_enter_common() Wu Fengguang
2011-10-31 9:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-10-31 10:43 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-10-31 11:41 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-10-31 12:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-10-31 15:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-11-01 0:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-01 7:07 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-01 14:36 ` Carsten Emde
2011-11-01 15:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-01 16:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-01 16:32 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-02 14:44 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2011-11-02 14:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-11-02 15:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 15:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-11-03 16:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 14:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-11-02 15:01 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-02 15:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 15:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-10-31 12:31 ` Wu Fengguang
[not found] ` <20111031123708.GA6839@localhost>
2011-10-31 22:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-10 16:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-10 17:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-10 18:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-01 17:34 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-11-01 18:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111102144403.GA22445@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cbe@osadl.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox