From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
stable@kernel.org, Ulf Hansson <Ulf.Hansson@stericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6 v2] PM: Limit race conditions between runtime PM and system sleep (v2)
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 14:17:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111102211708.GA19025@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdafpsgUi-0K5krr2_Hp+8GzCG8ZPu-HVNOK0_7uwURxdg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 10:00:39PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 09:06:02PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> >> > So, what specific git commits do you want to see in the 3.0-stable
> >> > tree, and in what order should they be applied in?
> >>
> >> So to my untrained eye it looks like it should be applied like this (top to
> >> bottom) using the reverse commit order from the mainline kernel:
> >>
> >> e529192 PM: Introduce generic "noirq" callback routines for subsystems (v2)
> >> 455716e PM / Runtime: Update documentation of interactions with system sleep
> >> 1e2ef05 PM: Limit race conditions between runtime PM and system sleep (v2)
> >> f3393b6 PM / Runtime: Add new helper function: pm_runtime_status_suspended()
> >>
> >> So (2) documents the problem, (3) fixes it, whereas (1) and (4) makes
> >> it possible
> >> to write proper _noirq() code that does not race, IIRC.
> >
> > But, after this, it's just adding new infrastructure that drivers will
> > then be able to use. As I'm not adding new drivers to 3.0, there will
> > not be any users of this code, so why add it in the first place? It
> > doesn't look like this follows the rules of the stable kernel tree at
> > all, does it?
>
> We'll have to get some feedback from Rafael, but the way I percieved
> it, the patch (2) fixes a very real race, then fixing that makes it
> necessary for drivers using runtime_pm to do things differently to
> be on the safe side. But none were really fixed when first merging
> it.
>
> So on second thought you probably only want patch (2)
> "PM: Limit race conditions between runtime PM and system sleep (v2)"
> for stable.
Ok, Rafael, any objection to me applying just this one?
Linus, have you tested the 3.0 kernel with just this patch applied? If
not, please do so and let me know. I'll wait for that before doing
anything.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-02 21:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-25 22:54 [PATCH 0/3] PM: Fix up interactions between system suspend/resume and runtime PM Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-06-25 22:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] PM / Runtime: Update documentation of interactions with system sleep Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-06-25 22:58 ` Jesper Juhl
2011-06-26 3:01 ` Alan Stern
2011-06-26 20:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-06-25 22:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] PM / Runtime: Return special error code if runtime PM is disabled Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-06-25 22:56 ` [PATCH 3/3] PM: Limit race conditions between runtime PM and system sleep Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-06-26 2:57 ` Alan Stern
2011-06-26 20:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-06-28 15:56 ` Ming Lei
2011-06-28 21:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-06-29 14:11 ` Alan Stern
2011-06-29 19:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-07-01 16:22 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-07-01 19:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-06-29 21:29 ` [PATCH 0/6 v2] PM: Fix up interactions between system suspend/resume and runtime PM Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-06-29 21:31 ` [PATCH 1/6 v2] PM / Runtime: Update documentation of interactions with system sleep Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-06-29 21:32 ` [PATCH 2/6 v2] PM / Runtime: Return special error code if runtime PM is disabled Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-06-29 21:33 ` [PATCH 3/6 v2] PCI / PM: Detect early wakeup in pci_pm_prepare() Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-06-29 21:34 ` [PATCH 4/6 v2] PM: Limit race conditions between runtime PM and system sleep (v2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-10-27 13:54 ` Linus Walleij
2011-10-27 20:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-10-28 20:00 ` Linus Walleij
2011-11-02 19:14 ` Greg KH
2011-11-02 20:06 ` Linus Walleij
2011-11-02 20:11 ` Greg KH
2011-11-02 21:00 ` Linus Walleij
2011-11-02 21:17 ` Greg KH [this message]
2011-11-03 0:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-11-03 1:31 ` Greg KH
2011-06-29 21:35 ` [PATCH 5/6 v2] PM / Runtime: Improve documentation of enable, disable and barrier Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-06-29 21:35 ` [PATCH 6/6 v2] PM / Runtime: Replace "run-time" with "runtime" in documentation Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111102211708.GA19025@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=Ulf.Hansson@stericsson.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox