From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933304Ab1KCMkT (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2011 08:40:19 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:49330 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933120Ab1KCMkR (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2011 08:40:17 -0400 Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 05:18:20 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Sven Joachim Cc: Christoph Biedl , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [068/107] Update email address for stable patch submission Message-ID: <20111103121820.GB7102@suse.de> References: <20111102221600.GA26650@kroah.com> <20111102221456.335891562@clark.kroah.org> <1320307257@msgid.manchmal.in-ulm.de> <87k47hd34q.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87k47hd34q.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 09:25:09AM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: > Am 03.11.2011 um 09:08 schrieb Christoph Biedl: > > > Greg KH wrote... > > > > (...) > > > > Just out of curiosity: > > > >> - Send the patch, after verifying that it follows the above rules, to > >> - stable@vger.kernel.org. > >> + stable@vger.kernel.org. > >> - The sender will receive an ACK when the patch has been accepted into the > > > >> other developers and by the relevant subsystem maintainer. > >> - - If the stable@vger.kernel.org address is added to a patch, when it goes into > >> + - If the stable@vger.kernel.org address is added to a patch, when it goes into > >> Linus's tree it will automatically be emailed to the stable team. > > > > Whatever you used to create the patches, why did these hunks come into > > existence? > > The original lines should have had the stable@kernel.org email address, > looks like Greg's scripts eagerly replaced those with the new address… Ugh, yes, that was due to me running a script on the emails to keep any old stable@kernel.org address out of them when I sent them out. The original patch is fine, thanks for checking. greg k-h