From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752245Ab1KCNaW (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2011 09:30:22 -0400 Received: from e8.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.138]:33809 "EHLO e8.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751183Ab1KCNaU (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2011 09:30:20 -0400 Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 06:29:42 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Josh Triplett , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com, patches@linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 17/28] rcu: Make srcu_read_lock_held() call common lockdep-enabled function Message-ID: <20111103132942.GY2287@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20111102203017.GA3830@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1320265849-5744-17-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20111103034854.GD2042@leaf> <20111103111413.GC8198@somewhere.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111103111413.GC8198@somewhere.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) x-cbid: 11110313-9360-0000-0000-00000049ADD9 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 12:14:20PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 08:48:54PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 01:30:38PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > From: Frederic Weisbecker > > > > > > A common debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled() function is used to check whether > > > RCU lockdep splats should be reported, but srcu_read_lock() does not > > > use it. This commit therefore brings srcu_read_lock_held() up to date. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney > > > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker > > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney > > > > Just how signed off does this patch need to be? ;) If you have sufficient patience to scroll past the Signed-off-by's to see the patch, then there clearly are not enough. ;-) > Dunno but I feel uncomfortable now with that strange feeling I'm walking > on the street with two Paul holding my hand on each side. I did catch one of these, but missed the other. Here is the history: o Paul wrote the patch. o Frederic reworked the patches that this one depended on, and then resent the patch. o Paul did "git am -s" on the series that Frederic sent, which added the extra Signed-off-by. It is not clear to me what the Signed-off-by chain should look like in this case. My default action would be to remove my second Signed-off-by. Thanx, Paul