From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934241Ab1KCRFm (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2011 13:05:42 -0400 Received: from mail-vw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]:64501 "EHLO mail-vw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932995Ab1KCRFl (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2011 13:05:41 -0400 Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 18:05:37 +0100 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Glauber Costa , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] new cgroup controller "fork" Message-ID: <20111103170532.GI8198@somewhere.redhat.com> References: <20111103162238.27609.11515.stgit@rabbit.intern.cm-ag> <4EB2C4A5.6000406@parallels.com> <20111103165903.GA4755@Debian-60-squeeze-64-minimal> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111103165903.GA4755@Debian-60-squeeze-64-minimal> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 05:59:03PM +0100, Max Kellermann wrote: > On 2011/11/03 17:43, Glauber Costa wrote: > > I do have a couple of questions about this, but the most important > > one is: Is this a competing implementation, or a cooperative effort > > with Frederic's ? > > Short answer: competing. > > Long answer: I do not know Frederic's patch. This is a repost of a > patch that I submitted 9 months ago: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/17/116 > > After little discussion, nobody seemed to be interested in it, and > nobody merged it. I reposted it today, not knowing somebody else had > come up with a similar idea meanwhile. Woops, sorry I never heard about it before I started working on this. Otherwise I would have tried to work with you.