From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/GIT PULL] Linux KVM tool for v3.2
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 17:13:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111104161329.GO1512@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EB3F9CE.1050407@siemens.com>
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 03:42:22PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-11-04 14:32, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > I know you don't see the benefits of integrated code base but I as a
> > developer do.
>
> IIRC, this discussion still lacks striking, concrete examples from the
> KVM tool vs. QEMU development processes.
How does it matter? KVM tool does not compete with QEMU. The use
cases for both programs are different. KVM tool is a helper for kernel
developers during development and additionally good example code on how
to use the KVM kernel interface (because it focuses on KVM only while
QEMU is much more than a KVM userspace).
Therefore it makes sense for KVM tool to be developed in the kernel tree
while it doesn't make sense for QEMU.
Regards,
Joerg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-04 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-04 8:38 [RFC/GIT PULL] Linux KVM tool for v3.2 Pekka Enberg
2011-11-04 12:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-04 12:35 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-11-04 13:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-04 13:32 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-11-04 14:42 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-11-04 15:16 ` Sasha Levin
2011-11-04 16:26 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-11-04 16:48 ` Sasha Levin
2011-11-04 17:33 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-11-04 16:13 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2011-11-04 16:42 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-11-04 17:41 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-11-04 13:14 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-11-04 14:47 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-11-08 14:44 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2011-11-08 15:36 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-11-08 16:00 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2011-11-10 3:50 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-11-10 6:46 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-11-10 7:57 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-11-10 8:21 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-11-10 8:23 ` Sasha Levin
2011-11-10 8:28 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-11-10 8:57 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-11-10 9:04 ` Sasha Levin
2011-11-10 9:09 ` Avi Kivity
2011-11-10 9:14 ` Sasha Levin
2011-11-10 9:23 ` Avi Kivity
2011-11-10 9:34 ` Sasha Levin
2011-11-10 9:43 ` Avi Kivity
2011-11-10 9:49 ` Sasha Levin
2011-11-10 9:50 ` Avi Kivity
2011-11-10 9:48 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-11-10 13:43 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-11-10 13:56 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-11-10 14:47 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-11-10 15:33 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111104161329.GO1512@8bytes.org \
--to=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox