From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] oom: do not kill tasks with oom_score_adj OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 23:18:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111107221847.GA7985@tiehlicka.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1111071353140.27419@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On Mon 07-11-11 13:54:38, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Nov 2011, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
> > index e916168..4883514 100644
> > --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> > +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> > @@ -185,6 +185,9 @@ unsigned int oom_badness(struct task_struct *p, struct mem_cgroup *mem,
> > if (!p)
> > return 0;
> >
> > + if (p->signal->oom_score_adj == OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > /*
> > * The memory controller may have a limit of 0 bytes, so avoid a divide
> > * by zero, if necessary.
>
> This leaves p locked, you need to do task_unlock(p) first.
Yes, right you are. Thanks for spotting this out.
>
> Once that's fixed, please add my
>
> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Thanks.
> and resubmit to Andrew for the 3.2 rc series. Thanks!
Andrew, could you push this for 3.2 (bugfix for post 3.1 kernel).
---
>From 10e06e7c0682af58236055ed38bfab58f7935253 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 12:59:44 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] oom: do not kill tasks with oom_score_adj OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
c9f01245 (oom: remove oom_disable_count) has removed oom_disable_count
counter which has been used for early break out from oom_badness so we
could never select a task with oom_score_adj set to OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN
(oom disabled).
Now that the counter is gone we are always going through heuristics
calculation and we always return a non zero positive value. This
means that we can end up killing a task with OOM disabled because it is
indistinguishable from regular tasks with 1% resp. CAP_SYS_ADMIN tasks
with 3% usage of memory or tasks with oom_score_adj set but OOM enabled.
Let's break out early if the task should have OOM disabled.
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
---
mm/oom_kill.c | 5 +++++
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index e916168..4465fb8 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -185,6 +185,11 @@ unsigned int oom_badness(struct task_struct *p, struct mem_cgroup *mem,
if (!p)
return 0;
+ if (p->signal->oom_score_adj == OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN) {
+ task_unlock(p);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
/*
* The memory controller may have a limit of 0 bytes, so avoid a divide
* by zero, if necessary.
--
1.7.7.1
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
SUSE LINUX s.r.o.
Lihovarska 1060/12
190 00 Praha 9
Czech Republic
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-07 22:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20111104143145.0F93B8B45E@mx2.suse.de>
2011-11-07 21:54 ` [PATCH] oom: do not kill tasks with oom_score_adj OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN David Rientjes
2011-11-07 22:18 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2011-11-07 22:22 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111107221847.GA7985@tiehlicka.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=yinghan@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox