From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932203Ab1KHLc5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Nov 2011 06:32:57 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:11877 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753220Ab1KHLcz (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Nov 2011 06:32:55 -0500 Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 06:31:50 -0500 From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" To: Ingo Molnar Cc: "Ted Ts'o" , Pekka Enberg , Vince Weaver , Pekka Enberg , Anthony Liguori , Avi Kivity , "kvm@vger.kernel.org list" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List" , qemu-devel Developers , Alexander Graf , Blue Swirl , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Am=E9rico?= Wang , Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Subject: Re: [F.A.Q.] perf ABI backwards and forwards compatibility Message-ID: <20111108113150.GA13195@redhat.com> References: <20111106231953.GD4500@thunk.org> <20111107175942.GA9395@elte.hu> <20111107203514.GG24234@thunk.org> <20111108102235.GA1241@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111108102235.GA1241@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi - On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 11:22:35AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > [...] These examples show *PICTURE PERFECT* forwards ABI > compatibility, using the ancient perf tool on a bleeding edge > kernel. [...] Almost: they demonstrate that those parts of the ABI that these particular perf commands rely on have been impressively compatible. Do you have any sort of ABI coverage measurement, to see what parts of the ABI these perf commands do not use? - FChE