From: "Roedel, Joerg" <Joerg.Roedel@amd.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org" <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
"bhelgaas@google.com" <bhelgaas@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci: More PRI/PASID cleanup
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 18:54:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111108175410.GH5182@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1320773518.19116.30.camel@bling.home>
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 10:31:58AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 18:17 +0100, Roedel, Joerg wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 09:44:30AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> >
> > > bit 0 (PCI_PASID_ENABLE) is reserved in the CAP register...
> >
> > Is it? Which spec are you using? In my version it is not reserved but
> > states if it is supported to set the enable-bit.
>
> Latest I can find is the March 31, 2011 PASID ECN, which just lists that
> bit as reserved.
Okay, my one is older and there it is stated as I implemented it. I will
check with reality first before changing the code...
> I can drop it if need be, was just trying to do some cleanup on the
> consistency of pci_reg.h before adding a bunch more defines to help
> bounds checking and parsing for vfio-pci. Unless my spec is outdated,
> it seems like there's more than an aesthetic change here though, so
> resolving the conflicts with your latest work might be warranted.
Fine with me. The best is probably when I carry this change forward
(when Jesse is ok with that) and put my changes on-top of that.
Thanks,
Joerg
--
AMD Operating System Research Center
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24 85609 Dornach
General Managers: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd
Registration: Dornach, Landkr. Muenchen; Registerger. Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-08 17:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-03 3:53 [PATCH] pci: More PRI/PASID cleanup Alex Williamson
2011-11-08 16:28 ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-11-08 16:44 ` Alex Williamson
2011-11-08 17:17 ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-11-08 17:31 ` Alex Williamson
2011-11-08 17:54 ` Roedel, Joerg [this message]
2011-11-08 18:20 ` Alex Williamson
2011-11-09 9:59 ` Roedel, Joerg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111108175410.GH5182@amd.com \
--to=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox